ChaseDream

标题: 大全-13-16 [打印本页]

作者: winnie    时间: 2004-12-7 11:43
标题: 大全-13-16

大全-13-16. For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.


The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?


(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.


(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.


(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.


(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.D


(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.


如果D改为Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail,肯定选它了。但是为什么要加at some time来限制?有时选项中出现“有时”、“一段时间”、“部分”就要排除的。


谢谢!


作者: leeon    时间: 2004-12-7 13:41

对某一个国家禁运成功的话,要求高度的国际一致性去阻止货物进出。对P港的禁运行动导致了国际上禁运的不一致。

说明肯定有贸易禁运失败了。at some time说明了这个事情发生的一种可能性。只要任何一个时间时间上的贸易出入存在。都说明了原文的国际上禁运的不一致。


作者: winnie    时间: 2004-12-7 17:12

还是不很清楚,回头我再好好想想。

对于支持的结论,不需要一定正确吗,只要有一点可能性就对,即使at orther time,是其他情况?


作者: Beebee    时间: 2004-12-7 17:25
你认为的正确结论"Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail"包含了"at any time",所以"at some time"也正确,"at other time"也正确,当然题目不会出"at other time"因为"other time"没有比较对象。
作者: leeon    时间: 2004-12-8 14:21
以下是引用winnie在2004-12-7 17:12:00的发言:

还是不很清楚,回头我再好好想想。


对于支持的结论,不需要一定正确吗,只要有一点可能性就对,即使at orther time,是其他情况?


是一定正确的;用at some time没用at any time恰恰说明了一定正确,因为肯定是在某个时间有贸易出入该国了。


作者: winnie    时间: 2004-12-8 14:44
谢谢leeon。终于理解了。
作者: 笨笨可可    时间: 2008-6-11 10:02
以下是引用winnie在2004-12-7 11:43:00的发言:

大全-13-16. For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.

The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.

(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.

(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.

(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.D

(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.

如果D改为Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail,肯定选它了。但是为什么要加at some time来限制?有时选项中出现“有时”、“一段时间”、“部分”就要排除的。

谢谢!

请问B错在哪里?这不是典型的无因无国吗?


作者: 吴羽若    时间: 2008-8-21 15:10

本来和楼上同问的,但突然之间反应过来了。

B说如果国际社会都反对P国的话,禁运就可以成功。但是有可能大家都反对P国,可对于封锁P国的港口却不一定意见一致,而如果这个意见不一致,禁运就有可能不成功。

是不是这样理解?

 


作者: wangjieava23    时间: 2011-1-13 17:47
开始我也错在了 at some time,
句子里,embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.
都在表示一种可能性。
作者: zzloveyibo    时间: 2014-4-8 19:44
leeon 发表于 2004-12-7 13:41
对某一个国家禁运成功的话,要求高度的国际一致性去阻止货物进出。对P港的禁运行动导致了国际上禁运的不一 ...

终于懂了。。。。。
作者: xiaowanzi2015    时间: 2015-2-26 01:13
B的错误是因为:embargo的成功需要两方面,international accord和ability,B仅仅说acoord就能成功,不对,还应考虑ability的问题。
作者: AnnieFFish    时间: 2016-9-6 17:18
同意楼上
trade embargo的成功 有两个条件,因为原文说的是both...and...
必须两个条件同时满足了,才可以






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3