ChaseDream

标题: last-10-2-16 [打印本页]

作者: swimmingfrog 时间: 2004-12-7 04:54
标题: last-10-2-16

16(B). Some people take their moral cues from governmental codes of law; for them, it is inconceivable that something that is legally permissible could be immoral.

Those whose view is described above hold inconsistent beliefs if they also believe that

(A) law does not cover all circumstances in which one person morally wrongs another

(B) a legally impermissible action is never morally excusable

(D) the moral consensus of a society is expressed in its laws（A）

(E) some governmental regulations are so detailed that they are burdensome to the economy

这题不懂

作者: chelseayang 时间: 2004-12-8 11:03

the stimulus: some people draw moral codes from law codes. they belive that, if something is legal, it could not be immoral, i.e., if something is legal, it must be moral.

however, A says, some circumstances, where people act immorally, are not covered by law codes. i.e., something can be legal but immoral.

作者: swimmingfrog 时间: 2004-12-9 04:25

nod, nod.版主的理解能力了得.

我得多读,读透才行!

作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-12 19:41

swimmingfrog 发表于 2004-12-7 04:54
16(B).          Some people take their moral cues from governmental co ...

Spot the question type: Negate of the argument's necessary assumption by adding the premise ( Weaken )

if it is conceivable for those people that something is legally permissible, it must be " not immoral ".

So, what we are looking for is, either something sufficiently guaranteed the sufficient condition of the argument but lead to the negate of the necessary condition of the argument or being necessary by the sufficient condition of the argument but contracted and inconsistent with the necessary condition.

A. If people also believe that law does not cover all circumstances where one people morally wrongs another, then it must be true that under some circumstances, they believe that even something is legally permissible, it could be either immoral or moral.

( Correct Answer - Negate the necessary condition of the argument )

B. legally impermissible ---> No morally excusable. So If being morally excusable, it must be legally permissible. ( It contradicts the premises )

C. Not relevant to the argument

D. Not relevant to the argument

E. Not relevant to the argument

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)