ChaseDream

标题: LAST-2-4-12 [打印本页]

作者: yiyang 时间: 2004-12-3 20:41
标题: LAST-2-4-12

LAST-2-4-12

“Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.”

Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor’s second reason does not cancel out the first?

(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient’s records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.

(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor’s office staff.

(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.

(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.（A）

(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors’ patients took no advantage of this policy.

不明白"second"什么意思,为什么选A?

谢谢

作者: chelseayang 时间: 2004-12-4 13:27

the second reason means: according to my experience/if my experience is reliable, no patient would request the medical record anyway.

根据STIMULUS可以看出, 如果REASON2 是对的话，REASON1 是否对就无关紧要了

但如果医生在看病的时候就能马上出病历(as stated in A),那就没有RETRIVING 耗时的问题了, 因为反正医生已经把这工作在见病人的时候就做完了, 这个时候，REASON1是否是真的就变的很重要了

不知道我表达清楚没有, 呵呵

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-4 13:37:43编辑过]

作者: yiyang 时间: 2004-12-4 23:14

白了,解释得非常清楚,感激涕零.

作者: dalunzi 时间: 2004-12-8 11:58

我同意“根据STIMULUS可以看出, 如果REASON2 是对的话，REASON1 是否对就无关紧要了”

但是正因为如此，我就不同意“但如果医生在看病的时候就能马上出病历(as stated in A),那就没有RETRIVING 耗时的问题了, 因为反正医生已经把这工作在见病人的时候就做完了, 这个时候，REASON1是否是真的就变的很重要了” 因为这和大前提是自相矛盾的，“REASON1 是否对本就无关紧要”，讨论它正确与否有什么意义？reason2此时还是能cansel out 它。

这题没想明白，请继续指点！