ChaseDream

标题: 求教！！！关于OG sc 中的逻辑关系问题 [打印本页]

作者: bbnv11 时间: 2013-3-20 18:53
标题: 求教！！！关于OG sc 中的逻辑关系问题
想问问大侠们，OG是如何在这一题中判断逻辑关系的？OG 13 sc 23 The Iroquois were primarily planters, but supplementing their cultivation of maize, squash, and beans withfishing and hunting.
with fishing and hunting.
(A) but supplementing

(B) and had supplemented
(C) and even though they supplemented
D) although they supplemented
(E) but with supplementing

这道题根据连词可以轻松做出，但OG却搞了个逻辑意思解题
“本题的逻辑是对比而非补充，而且因为反对一个主句，重要性不相等，所以要用从句

对比这个我可以看出来，但OG是如何判断这个重要性的？并且进而提出要用从句，为什么？
真心求解

作者: bbnv11 时间: 2013-3-20 22:18

有么有牛牛在

作者: bbnv11 时间: 2013-3-21 09:34
顶啊

作者: bbnv11 时间: 2013-3-21 14:31

作者: bbnv11 时间: 2013-3-21 17:23

有这么难吗

作者: DUKB24 时间: 2013-3-21 18:59
notice the word “ primarily”

I think this is the key word why the other part should be subordinate clause

despite they do something，they primarily belong to blablabla....

if you use and，it could not show this kind of contrast

if you use but，the emphasized part should be the clause led by the word“but” such structure make the existence of “primarily” a little bit awkward

personal opinion ，open to discussion

作者: bbnv11 时间: 2013-3-21 21:21
那是不是说，有primarily 在的那一句话就是句子的逻辑重心呢？

作者: DUKB24 时间: 2013-3-21 21:22
嗯，可以这么理解

作者: bbnv11 时间: 2013-3-21 21:24

谢了

作者: liyao604 时间: 2014-7-25 20:21
好赞！！！帮助很大！！！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)