ChaseDream

标题: last-3-4-8 [打印本页]

作者: swimmingfrog 时间: 2004-12-2 00:55
标题: last-3-4-8

last -3-4-8

8. rominent business executives often play active roles in United States presidential campaigns as fundraisers or backroom strategists. But few actually seek to become president themselves. Throughout history the great majority of those who have sought to become president have been Lawyers, military leaders, or full-time politicians. This is understandable, for the personality and skills that make for success in business do not make for success in politics. Business is largely hierarchical, whereas politics is coordinative. As a result, business executives tend to be uncomfortable with compromises and power sharing, which are inherent in polities.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the proposed explanation of why business executives do not run for president?

(A) Many of the most active presidential fundraisers and backroom strategists are themselves politicians.

(B) Military leaders are generally no more comfortable with compromises and power sharing than are business executives.

(C) Some of the skills needed to become a successful lawyer are different from some of those needed to become a successful military leader.

(D) Some former presidents have engaged in business ventures after leaving office.（B）

(E) Some hierarchically structured companies have been major financial supporters of candidates for president.

A错在哪里?

作者: swimmingfrog 时间: 2004-12-2 08:02

有没有人知道啊,自己鼎一下

作者: cicilla 时间: 2004-12-6 13:57

本题中business executives不能成功，而politicians能成功，因为“business executives tend to be uncomfortable with compromises and power sharing, which are inherent in polities”，也就是说politians 是不会“uncomfortable with compromises and power sharing"的。

要weaken本题结论，就说Politicians也是会"uncomfortable"的。（直接否定论据）

我是这么想的。我也才做，所以没有什么很好的理论给你总结。请那些大牛们做一个总结好了。

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-12-7 21:07
原文要WEAKEN的结论是：两种职业的特点的差别解释了 business executives do not run for president。A说的是很多幕僚本身是政治家。你认为有关吗。

作者: swimmingfrog 时间: 2004-12-8 01:41

我选A 的思路是：business uncomfortable------>don't run for president

political comfortable------->run for president

A说的是很多幕僚本身是政治家，说明business excutives either don't run for president or run for president,所以weaken.

现在我知道了business 与politican 是不可同存的：

business executives uncomfortable---->no presidential

politician run for presidential ------>comfortable

weaken: politician as uncomfortable as business。

作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-11 14:28

swimmingfrog 发表于 2004-12-2 00:55
last -3-4-88.    &nbsprominent business executives often play active roles in Unite ...

BP in USPC ---> either f or bs

History speaking ---> great majority who sought to be president ---> L or Ml or Full-time politician ---> personality and skills of business --->no success in politics

Business is largely hierarchical, and. politics is coordinative

C: BE ---> not comfortable with compromises and power sharing ---> important in politics

So, as spotting the necessary assumption of the argument, what might come into your brain first?

If being both president and lawyer, military leaders or full time politicians, they must be more comfortable with compromises and power sharing than business executive.

Let us dive into the answers.

A. well, how could that even relevant to the argument ?

Are all the business executives are either fundraisers and backroom strategists ? If not, then how could you even use this option being non relevant to weaken the argument ?

B. Only if being more comfortable with compromises and power sharing is necessary, lawyer, military leaders, or full-time politicians can be better qualify as being president than business executive.

* this is our necessary assumption, and b just simply negate it to crack our argument.

C. How could C even relevant to the argument. how could you defines the skills needed here are also the skills required within the argument ? how could you even determine how that different was, and most important, even its true that you can determine all the questions above, who to say it is the key factor to weaken the argument ?

D. So what ? you do not have basketball shoes to play basketball now, does not mean after playing basketball in the near future, you can not go buy basketball shoes.

E. ...

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)