ChaseDream

标题: [求助] OG-63 [打印本页]
作者: heartbrave    时间: 2004-11-30 19:42
标题: [求助] OG-63
63. Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making. However, a recent study found that top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle-or lower-level managers. This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.



问Assumption



(A) Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions。


(B) Top managers have the ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning in making decisions。


(C) The decisions made by middle-and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning.


D) Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions。


(E) Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle-or lower-level managers


答案是E


菜鸟问题：我看不懂OG对D和A的解释，大家帮帮忙？谢谢


the  argument is consistent with managers at all levels using intuition in the minority of decisions made. Thus, choice D is inappropriate.



To the extent that less effective methods are inappropriate, the passage does not assume A, but argues for it.

作者: mindfree    时间: 2004-12-1 05:09

The explanation to D is that D would be untrue and the argument still holds. It says that "the argument is consistent with ..." to show that it is possible that all managers  are using intuition for most of decisions, e.g. top managers make 10% of the decision using intuition while lower managers use intuition for 5% of decision.

A is what the argument is trying to prove, not an assumption. If you do not know what assumption is, you have not started CR.

作者: heartbrave    时间: 2004-12-1 13:12

谢谢，这些个东东经常出现解释中，一直都看不明白， 今天看到总教头的指点，好激动啊


作者: 我爱欧洲    时间: 2005-5-26 20:42
B的解释为since the argument leaves open the possibility of situations in which top manager are unable to use one of the methods ,choice B is inappropriate.这其中leaves open the possibility of situations 是什么意思？如果对B取非，高层主管什么都不会用，那结论肯定不成立，所以B 也是ASSUMPTION啊。请大家指点！
作者: bigmouse    时间: 2005-5-26 22:12

当B取非以后，意思是高级经理没有能力用感觉推理或按部就班的推理。对结论并没有什么作用。换句话说高级经理有没有能力用……，对结论This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning没有任何削弱作用～～


个人意见～～

作者: 辛辛    时间: 2005-6-10 14:26
如果把D取非,则推理毫无意义.所以选D.
作者: welkin    时间: 2005-6-19 14:11

个人觉得OG是从“假设是文中结论成立的必要条件”方面进行解释的，也就是说如果一个选项，在原文结论成立的基础上，可能不成立，这个选项就不可能是结论的前提假设。


比如答案B，OG解释说：Since the argument leaves open the possibility of situations in which top managers are unable to use one of the methods, choice B is inappropriate ，就是在说原文的argument成立的情况下有可能top managers are unable to use one of the methods，也就是B不成立。
D也是类似的原因

作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-7-21 23:20
以下是引用mindfree在2004-12-1 5:09:00的发言：

The explanation to D is that D would be untrue and the argument still holds. It says that "the argument is consistent with ..." to show that it is possible that all managers  are using intuition for most of decisions, e.g. top managers make 10% of the decision using intuition while lower managers use intuition for 5% of decision.


A is what the argument is trying to prove, not an assumption. If you do not know what assumption is, you have not started CR.


还是没有看懂OG对D的解释，为何...in the minority of decision made? 即便是对D取非，the argument 也不一定 consistent with ..., 文中没有提到过minority的有关信息啊？

请大家帮忙？

作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-7-22 10:56
UP
作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-7-23 00:04

UP

作者: Kevin4U    时间: 2005-8-27 21:39
up!
作者: Curtis01    时间: 2005-9-14 01:51

D的另一个意思..认为在少数议题上,所有level的主管用intutition的情形是一样的


原题是要讨论more effective..故不选

作者: wingkim    时间: 2005-9-29 11:32
以下是引用snowjing在2005-7-21 23:20:00的发言：


还是没有看懂OG对D的解释，为何...in the minority of decision made? 即便是对D取非，the argument 也不一定 consistent with ..., 文中没有提到过minority的有关信息啊？

请大家帮忙？


minority 是对majority取非，套用mindfree的例子e.g. top managers make 10% of the decision using intuition while lower managers use intuition for 5% of decision. 仍然符合题目的条件，top managers>other managers，一样存在得出原文结论的可能（consistent with）。

作者: hitlzc    时间: 2005-11-6 21:03
以下是引用wingkim在2005-9-29 11:32:00的发言：


minority 是对majority取非，套用mindfree的例子e.g. top managers make 10% of the decision using intuition while lower managers use intuition for 5% of decision. 仍然符合题目的条件，top managers>other managers，一样存在得出原文结论的可能（consistent with）。


这个解释很容易理解.也就是说不管是minority还是majority都支持结论D和D取非均支持结论,因此D不对.

作者: KATIEUS    时间: 2006-11-11 19:08

TO ALL THE FIRENDS WHO HAVE PROBLEMS  WITH D

本题FOCUS ON EFFETIVE DECISIONS

NOT ON THE PROPORTION OF TIME 。

作者: ligaoping    时间: 2007-7-26 10:42

E对，没有异议。B为什么不对呢？B项取非应该只有一种直觉推理能力的话，并不能说明直觉比按部就班的推理能力好啊。不是因为好，而是高级经理只会直觉办事。否定了结论。

请大家指正！

作者: danielzh_sg    时间: 2007-11-26 21:51

我连文章的逻辑都没看懂，真晕。谁能解释一下逻辑关系吗？





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3