我看C对，A 有问题。In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.
A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted [A]
答案是A没有疑问 请问if从句后为何用过去时啊 这与主句时态不一致
谢谢
难道对于从句的虚拟语气 主句无需有相应的虚拟语气吗
谢谢
单独的虚拟条件句可以存在。
但是好像没有虚拟主句+真实条件句的组合。
corporation为何要用单数，corporations不行吗?
发完贴就发现了its的问题，了解了。
我看C对，A 有问题。对 one of +复数名词 后面的verb也是复数； the one of ＋复数名词，后面的verb 是单数 ！
从这个语法点 A错了！ 应该是 commit
其次， a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted 既然有定冠词the，那么employee应该是复数更合理，与前面的 its employees 对称
相反，B没有这两个问题。
也许were给人感觉不好，但是were在这里应该还是可以表达be 的作用，而不是因为在if后面有“如果。。却与实际相反的意思”而改变原意
总之，A的错误在那，我选了B
我看C对，A 有问题。C不可能对，one of its employees就跟companies不对应
skyalan的講法有點confusing...
1. one of the employees主詞是one不是employees, 應該用單數形式
2. 因為前面在講 "如果員工當中的有人犯罪, 這個人..." 定冠詞是為了point out this specific employee, 還是應該用單數
關於前面所提到的虛擬, if the employee acted跟緊接著的if the corporation benefited 是很完美的平行...
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
这里的does能这样用么,表示commits的省略
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
这里的does能这样用么,表示commits的省略
I don't think so, because we don't know "one of its employees does" what. 同意！
何况前面的动词是复数形式的。
问个问题：if条件句子里用虚拟语气的情况OG里面有出现过吗？
有谁能给提供一下？
偶看OG的时候经常发现自己想选虚拟，结果答案说不用。
，请指教。Please help out!
I want to know why E is incorrect? where is the test point?
if 从句不能轻易改动，E改变了原文的意思，而且E不平行
A. if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.(平行）
if 从句不能轻易改动，E改变了原文的意思，而且E不平行
A. if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.(平行）
同意！！！
此外，commits a crime前的comma应该去掉，且employees和the employee单复数不对应
B明显错误，if后面的主语肯定是单数，不让within the scope of his or her authority 肯定改成their authorities了。
E不清楚，只是觉得很罗索。
对 one of +复数名词 后面的verb也是复数； the one of ＋复数名词，后面的verb 是单数 ！
从这个语法点 A错了！ 应该是 commit
我记得的是这样的：one of ns＋单数谓语
one of ns +single V.
one of ns which +plural V.我是这么记得。
坦率讲，我认为04，05年CD的精英辈出，但是这个帖子让我哦大跌眼镜
该题应该选A，以前也讨论过
a corporation...whenever...,if...and if....这算什么结构?
毫无疑问"a corporation..."是主句, "whenever..."是状语从句. 然而两个"if..."算什么成分?
从句套从句?第一个if前似乎多了个逗号.
三个从句并列?应该把并列的部分放到同一个if从句中才对呀.
E似乎没错嘛! the corporation (whose employees commit a crime), commits a crime, [whenever the employee acted
within the scope of his or her authority] and [if the corporation benefited as a result]意思是说"当职员的行为在其职权范围内 并且 如果公司从中获利, 那么该公司(其职员有犯罪行为的公司)就犯罪了".
其中主句是 "the corporation commits a crime", 从句是两个并列条件: "whenever..."和"if...", 而"whose..."是corporation一词的定语从句.
而且从句中的"act"就是指代主句中的"commit a crime".
都讲得通.
a corporation...whenever...,if...and if....这算什么结构?
毫无疑问"a corporation..."是主句, "whenever..."是状语从句. 然而两个"if..."算什么成分?
从句套从句?第一个if前似乎多了个逗号.
三个从句并列?应该把并列的部分放到同一个if从句中才对呀.
E似乎没错嘛! the corporation (whose employees commit a crime), commits a crime, [whenever the employee acted
within the scope of his or her authority] and [if the corporation benefited as a result]意思是说"当职员的行为在其职权范围内 并且 如果公司从中获利, 那么该公司(其职员有犯罪行为的公司)就犯罪了".
其中主句是 "the corporation commits a crime", 从句是两个并列条件: "whenever..."和"if...", 而"whose..."是corporation一词的定语从句.
而且从句中的"act"就是指代主句中的"commit a crime".
都讲得通.
自己拍砖: A就是并列结构, E中的whose employee与the employee不对应,故错.
参http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=1042348&id=108708&skin=0
答案是A.
就A 的 两个if对称所以选Ａ
好奇怪的句子,
莫名其妙的虚拟
A：whenever one of its employees commits a crime
A中的 commits 绝对错啊，one of + 复数名词 + that verb(复数)
这道题到底怎么回事啊？
对于起，A 是正确的
以下两种结构是不同的
（1）one of 复数名词 + 单数谓语
（2）one of 复数名词 + that + 复数谓语
我刚才搞混了
A 中当然是（1）的情况,没有错
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
这里的does能这样用么,表示commits的省略
同意！
何况前面的动词是复数形式的。
问个问题：if条件句子里用虚拟语气的情况OG里面有出现过吗？
有谁能给提供一下？
偶看OG的时候经常发现自己想选虚拟，结果答案说不用。
不太明白does这个地方，因为主语是单数所以后面是单数啊，而且可以就近指前面那个词，为什么不可以？谢谢！！！
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.
A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted
自我分析：
注意原题里没划线的部分有 and if，暗示句子有并列关系，if后面用的过去时态，那and前面应该也是过去时态。
B，were acting与后面没划线的and if后时态不同，错；
C，corporations与后面的its代词指代不一致，acts
与后面的benefited时态不平行；that错；
D，an employee与commit
主谓不一致，it 代词无指代对象；
E，用whose employees commit a crime
成了限定corporation，特指该类企业了（员工犯了罪的企业）犯罪了，逻辑意思改变。
原文想说的是：在某种情况下，如果一个公司的职员犯罪了，那该公司也算犯罪了。因此E错。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |