ChaseDream

标题: GWD-3-38 [打印本页]

作者: concong    时间: 2004-11-27 19:53
标题: GWD-3-38

Q35 to Q38:



          Historians who study European



          women of the Renaissance try to mea-


          sure “independence,” “options,” and


Line   other indicators of the degree to which


  (5)    the expression of women’s individuality


          was either permitted or suppressed.


          Influenced by Western individualism,


          these historians define a peculiar form


          of personhood:  an innately bounded


(10)    unit, autonomous and standing apart


           from both nature and society.  An


           anthropologist, however, would contend


          that a person can be conceived in ways


          other than as an “individual.”  In many


(15)    societies a person’s identity is not


          intrinsically unique and self-contained


         but instead is defined within a complex


         web of social relationships.


              In her study of the fifteenth-century


(20)   Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a


         historian who specializes in European


        women of the Renaissance attributes


       individual intention and authorship of


       actions to her subject.  This historian


(25)   assumes that Alessandra had goals


        and interests different from those of her


        sons, yet much of the historian’s own


         research reveals that Alessandra


        acted primarily as a champion of her


(30)  sons’ interests, taking their goals as


       her own.  Thus Alessandra conforms


       more closely to the anthropologist’s


       notion that personal motivation is


      embedded in a social context.  Indeed,


(35)   one could argue that Alessandra did


       not distinguish her personhood from


      that of her sons.  In Renaissance


       Europe the boundaries of the con-


       ceptual self were not always firm


(40)   and closed and did not necessarily


         coincide with the boundaries of


        the bodily self.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


38.According to the passage, much of the research on Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) supports which of the following conclusions?





A.   Alessandra used her position as her sons’ sole guardian to further interests different from those of her sons.



B.    Alessandra unwillingly sacrificed her own interests in favor of those of her sons.



C.   Alessandra’s actions indicate that her motivations and intentions were those of an independent individual.



D.   Alessandra’s social context encouraged her to take independent action.


E.  Alessandra regarded her sons’ goals and interests as her own.



没想明白A怎么得出来得,请教


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-27 19:54:29编辑过]

作者: philikittist    时间: 2004-11-28 01:25
我觉得选C
作者: concong    时间: 2004-11-28 15:54
UP!!
作者: philikittist    时间: 2004-12-1 00:30
A得不出来,因为是错的,呵呵
作者: cloudwind    时间: 2005-6-21 17:09
請問D為什麼不對?

是因為這題是細節而非推論嗎?


作者: wangyu73cn    时间: 2005-6-23 12:31

从问题来看,是问historian的研究(在客观上)支持什么结论,而不是问historian的观点。


鉴此,根据文章:yet much of the historian’s own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons’ interests, taking their goals as  her own.  可知E选项正确。


从文章内容看:Thus Alessandra conforms more closely to the anthropologist’s notion that personal motivation is embedded in a social context. D选项:Alessandra’s social context encouraged her to take independent action也有一定的道理。但基本是属于推论内容,不能从research的内容中直接得出吧。


待讨论。


作者: swlfx    时间: 2005-7-25 18:40
同意王牛牛的精彩分析。
作者: Lucky0506    时间: 2005-7-29 11:21
E 吧!
作者: ESeraph    时间: 2005-8-31 21:03
why my GWD material does not include this question? whatz the answer to this one? THx in advance.
作者: vancouverade    时间: 2005-10-2 11:42
太奇怪了哦,我晕,LZ是哪里搞到的这道题的,不过这道题我支持C选项
作者: juice_papa    时间: 2005-10-7 23:49

yet much of the historian’s own


research reveals that Alessandra


acted primarily as a champion of her


(30)      sons’ interests, taking their goals as


            her own.



A选项中guardian就是原文champion的改写,看选项感觉像正确答案。


但是Line30中说 the widow "taking their goals as her own",如果非要向A靠拢,是不是A中as her sons’ sole guardian to further interests different from those of her sons 是说她把维护儿子的利益作为自己的利益,但是这种利益的出发角度是不同的?


不过我做题的时候选了E。。。


作者: leonchan    时间: 2005-10-8 02:50
XYGWD2中没有这题 呵呵 我支持E
作者: dan1028    时间: 2005-11-11 14:02
以下是引用ESeraph在2005-8-31 21:03:00的发言:
why my GWD material does not include this question? whatz the answer to this one? THx in advance.

me too!!!!!


作者: 乌龙茶    时间: 2005-12-18 16:12

应该选E吧


作者: brent_zhang    时间: 2005-12-20 16:19
我也选的是E
作者: brent_zhang    时间: 2005-12-20 16:24
但我觉得A选项的意思我怎么看不懂啊,哪位能够解释一下吗
作者: brent_zhang    时间: 2005-12-20 16:28
OH,是Alessandra利用她是儿子唯一监护人的地位谋取另外的利益。我真笨

作者: steveyangxt    时间: 2006-1-8 09:59
yet much of the historian’s own

         research reveals that Alessandra


        acted primarily as a champion of her


(30)  sons’ interests, taking their goals as


       her own.  Thus Alessandra conforms


       more closely to the anthropologist’s


       notion that personal motivation is


      embedded in a social context.  Indeed,


(35)   one could argue that Alessandra did


       not distinguish her personhood from


      that of her sons.  


划线部分是解题点。


作者: anniya    时间: 2006-8-8 19:18

WHY NOT C?

题目不是说SUPPORT吗?也就是说使INFER出来的,not got directively from the context!

所以e不对吧

那位说说?


作者: ecochem    时间: 2006-9-22 03:47

选E啦

A的意思好像和原文有出入


作者: closelipped    时间: 2007-6-19 09:51

    

正確選項為A

This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from
those of her sons
, yet much of the historian’s own research
reveals that Alessandra
acted
primarily as a champion
(監護人) of her sons’ interests, taking their goals as her own.


    

由文章可得知Alessandra
had diff. Goals
Alessandra acted as a champion of her sons兩件事實.


    

雖然historian認為Alessandra had diff. goals.但是,作者認為much of the historian’s research表示Alessandra
used the position, as a champion of her sons.


    

因此,可判斷文章最有可能support A選項的conclusion.


    E,乍看之下會選E,因為E選項敘述和文章相同,但是,此題是問文章最有可能支持下列哪一個conclusion,由於E選項並非是文章的結論,因此不能選E.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3