ChaseDream

标题: 请教另一题 [打印本页]

作者: paopao 时间: 2004-11-27 07:41
标题: 请教另一题
Q19:

Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property. In place of this

system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city.

Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount

raised for schools by property taxes. The critics are correct on this point. Nevertheless,

implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.

Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these

are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where

sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more. In consequence, retail sales in Aroca

City are bound to increase substantially.

In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a

prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.

B. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is

a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.

C. The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is

the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.

D. The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point

used by the argument to show that the claim is false.

E. The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second

presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.

这题的答案是D 我选了A 请教两者区别在哪我实在搞不定啊

谢谢

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-11-27 09:36

注意作者的评论：The critics are correct on this point。评论家在这点上是对的。后面的话表示评论家没有考虑将来，如果考虑了将来，评论家的话就是错的。所以作者不是要undermine评论家的话，而是要说明它根本就是FALSE的，只考虑一点，是没考虑到未来。所以D对。A错。而且D说得和原文结构非常吻合：第一个黑体就是作者要反对的，第二就是一个用于表示批评家是错的主要观点。

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-11-27 09:51
而且A的prediction, if accurate 也不好，原文用的都是be abound to(=be certain to)，这哪像是在预测，这是在说理。也不存在if accurate 的问题。作者就说一定会，不存在if accurate。

作者: hpp920 时间: 2004-12-23 13:27

lawyer老师你在吗? 这道题我选的是A,

我觉着main conclusion应该是

implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.

而支持它的evidence应该是

Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these

are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where

sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more.

由该evidence作出的预测(支持conclusion)是:retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

你帮再看看.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)