ChaseDream

标题: GWD-2-11不同意见 [打印本页]

作者: 花椰菜    时间: 2004-11-26 18:55
标题: GWD-2-11不同意见

Question 11:


Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are


commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine


makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to


drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers


without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.  Which of the following is an assumption


on which the argument depends?






A.      These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced


by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic


substances to their wine.


B.      Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.


C.      Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.


D.     Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give


rise to an allergic reaction.


E.      Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.


答案是D. 但是我觉得E更对,因为题干问的是an allergic reaction to certain sulfites,而D中说的是普通的allergic reaction,概念不同。不知各位高人如何看?



作者: Maggieyin    时间: 2004-11-27 05:06

D is correct

if i am right, you are talking about the parallel between curtain and 普通的. I think that commonly is adv. and curtain is adj.


作者: 花椰菜    时间: 2004-11-27 10:36
没有看明白楼上的意思。我觉得题目中说得很清楚,risking an allergic reaction to sulfites,并没有排除所有allergic reaction的意思。还觉得是E.  hehe,有点固执。
作者: hpp920    时间: 2004-11-27 13:41
这道题的答案就是E. 记得以前有讨论, 你可以搜搜.
作者: Maggieyin    时间: 2004-11-27 13:43

E is not acceptable.

according to the passage, people are allergic to sulfites,  no information regarding amount mentioned at all. so that, even E is assumed, it is not  clear whether it is of supportive to the the conclusion.


作者: hpp920    时间: 2004-11-28 00:17
Maggieyin,你注意看结论. 结论中有without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. 你将结论取非, 即酒中天然sulfites的含量足够让人过敏, 那么原题结论就不成立
作者: swiffer    时间: 2004-11-28 09:25

选E。对D取非,there are other substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction,不能削弱people can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites 的结论。


作者: p200002    时间: 2004-12-4 12:52
我的看法是,我们必须认识到整个ARGUMENT都是对的,所以花椰菜同志纠缠与S是指CERTAIN还是普通对解题没有帮助.

D有道理.

S -> 过敏
结论是:不含S的酒->不过敏

要使结论成立,必须假定WINE中没有出S以为其它使人过敏的成分.

至于E为什么不对,我也不知道.

作者: Maggieyin    时间: 2004-12-5 15:09

thank you all,  I made a wrong choice of D on account of my carelessness, the conclusion is concerning with allergic reaction to sulfites. if it suggested avoiding allergic reaction to wine itself. then D is worth considering.

According to the conclusion, sulfites is not only used as additive, but also contained in the wine as ingredient, therefore the amount contained in the wine should be assumed.


作者: fiona_hq    时间: 2009-7-20 13:59
up
作者: xiaoniuren    时间: 2009-7-28 21:12
DING




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3