ChaseDream

标题: OG-13-15 [打印本页]

作者: kudoucliff    时间: 2013-2-19 00:56
标题: OG-13-15
Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in March not as a sign that households were pressed for cash and forced to borrow, rather a sign of confidence by households that they could safely handle new debt.
A.rather a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
B.yet as a sign of households' confidence that it was safe for them to
C.but a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
D.but as a sign that households were confident they could safely
E.but also as a sign that households were confident in their ability safely to

求教此题的D选项,难道were confident后面不是应该有that吗?此处that并没有在从句(they could safely...)中充当object,因此是不可以省略的呀
作者: sisichen666    时间: 2013-2-19 01:36
这里的that其实就是一个有效性的问题,没有that含义理解不会有问题对吧,和这句理解是一样的:she said she would come,没有that是可以理解的对吧,那就没问题,但是这句 a sign (that) households were confident (that) they could safely你把that加上了,句子反而更加啰嗦冗余,结构不清,两个that从句能这么放着吗???是并列呢,还是嵌套呢?。。。。。反正是应避免使用that X that y这种表达。
作者: kudoucliff    时间: 2013-2-19 02:42
这里的that其实就是一个有效性的问题,没有that含义理解不会有问题对吧,和这句理解是一样的:she said she would come,没有that是可以理解的对吧,那就没问题,但是这句 a sign (that) households were confident (that) they could safely你把that加上了,句子反而更加啰嗦冗余,结构不清,两个that从句能这么放着吗???是并列呢,还是嵌套呢?。。。。。反正是应避免使用that X that y这种表达。
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2013/2/19 1:36:43)



Thanks so much
但是我记得Manhattan里说say引导的句子后面可以不用that,但仅仅是say
至于这个避免两个that嵌套……感觉还是有很多例子有两个that的吧……
作者: kiwifoodtown    时间: 2013-2-19 08:56
这里的that其实就是一个有效性的问题,没有that含义理解不会有问题对吧,和这句理解是一样的:she said she would come,没有that是可以理解的对吧,那就没问题,但是这句 a sign (that) households were confident (that) they could safely你把that加上了,句子反而更加啰嗦冗余,结构不清,两个that从句能这么放着吗???是并列呢,还是嵌套呢?。。。。。反正是应避免使用that X that y这种表达。
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2013/2/19 1:36:43)




Thanks so much
但是我记得Manhattan里说say引导的句子后面可以不用that,但仅仅是say
至于这个避免两个that嵌套……感觉还是有很多例子有两个that的吧……
-- by 会员 kudoucliff (2013/2/19 2:42:26)


不只say后面可以省略that,只要能够清晰的被理解,一般来讲,that引导宾语从句时,that可以被省略掉。
作者: yiqing2012    时间: 2013-2-20 00:27
gmat里尽量避免x that y that,x to y to, x for y for等结构,og上有一题就是为了避免所以把evidence后面的that改成了to do,我记得是:...evidence to suggest that...
关于宾语从句,我有不同的理解,如果很单纯,不是为了避免这些不好的结构的话,宾从的that是不能被省略的,而且如果宾从有很多并列的话,每一个that都是不能被省略的~ 这一点好像在manhattan,prep都有提到过,而且很多题也是以此作为split点的,例如:a poll suggests that...,and that...后面一个that显然不能省~~
作者: kudoucliff    时间: 2013-2-20 21:45
多谢楼上两位童鞋~~
作者: 杨雨琪    时间: 2013-3-20 20:06
请问从语法的角度来讲,they could  safely handle new debt在这里是个什么从句?
作者: edifier1990    时间: 2013-7-11 23:08
其实和LZ有相同的困惑,LS们的解释感觉有点道理,但是还是有点牵强。。。不过暂且没找到更合理的解释,那我就默默接受这个解释了吧。。。
好吧,我的措辞很redundant和wordy...
作者: kimfeng    时间: 2013-7-12 01:02
其实gmat好多自己出的题干就省略了that,在其他的选项都不对的时候如果不加that也不影响意思表达的话就也没问题。
作者: gjcherope    时间: 2013-8-21 16:32
我的问题是为什么在书中的解答当中提到了B和D的选项改变或者削弱了原文的意思?
作者: ljwqlcl881703    时间: 2013-10-13 00:57
跪求来一位牛牛  解答7楼问题 加了个that  they could safely handle new debt  是什么从句 ??????????身患强迫症的人 希望有人帮忙
作者: ljwqlcl881703    时间: 2013-10-13 01:00
我顶个!
作者: ljwqlcl881703    时间: 2013-10-13 01:03
再顶个!  睡觉!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3