ChaseDream

标题: OG13 Diagnostic Test的SC部分疑问求讨论！ [打印本页]

作者: GraceM 时间: 2013-1-31 21:36
标题: OG13 Diagnostic Test的SC部分疑问求讨论！
40.正确的句子如下：In 1995 RS,a well-known critic of the patent system,testified in Patent Office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kichhoff's laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary.
我的疑问是针对B选项：laws，which was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and it is.解答里说其中的一个问题是”WHICH is ambiguous because it could refer to one or to laws“.可是which是紧跟在 laws后面，直接理解为解释laws应该没有问题。从文意喝语意上来看都没有问题。而”one“是指的什么？

42.正确选项和题目融合的句子是：The Supreme Court has ruled that public universities can collect money even from students who object to particular activities, so long as the groups given money are chosen without regard to their views.我对这一句话的翻译是：最高法院已经裁定公立大学甚至可以从反对加入某些特定活动的学生收取活动费用,只要给收钱的组织不是基于他们自己的意见。
其中，对so long as the groups given money are chosen without regard to their views我的理解感觉不是很对？这句中的”their“到底指谁？

43.我的问题主要是B选项里面有个解释说：Woman Judges and partners 表达的是女法官和（不强调男女）合伙人，那么想表达女性的法官和合伙人该怎么表达呀？

46.题目和正确的选项融合：Researchers have found that individuals who have been blind from birth, and who thus have never seen anyone gestures, nevertheless make hand motions when speaking just as frequently and in virtually the same way as sighted people do, and that they will gesture even when conversing with another blind person.（其中两个黄色高光的连着两个并列的句子）
解释里面说 who have been blind from birth和who thus have never seen anyone gestures是平行的，随意是正确的。可是thus不是代表因此么？如果我的理解没错的话，and who thus have never seen anyone gestures实际是上一句的递进，因此是否也可以改写成：Researchers have found that individuals who have been blind from birth, thus never having seen anyone gestures...？

作者: 小臣 时间: 2013-3-3 10:49
同求 38 39 49！！求大神指点迷津！！！

作者: GraceM 时间: 2013-3-18 23:18

同求 38 39 49！！求大神指点迷津！！！

-- by 会员小臣 (2013/3/3 10:49:14)

嗯嗯？你的问题具体是什么？也许我能和你讨论讨论~

作者: smilinglily814 时间: 2013-3-23 04:41
42.我看了manhanttan论坛的英文解释还是没搞太懂。又看了点别的，好像通了点，写出来大家看看对不对啊。
The Supreme Court has ruled that public universities can collect money even from students who object to particular activities, so long as the groups given money are chosen without regard to their views.
我认为意思是，最高法院规定公立大学可向学生收取学生活动费，即使是向（那些）不同意某些活动的学生（收也可以），只要（基于一个条件）：得到钱的社团并不是由于他们（社团的）观点而被选的。
这里翻译成“观点”还是有点怪，但是也找不到更合适的含义了。是对那些反对学生持有的观点还是社团自己的“主张”（比如是干什么的社团，舞蹈，篮球）？
不知道我说的有没有make any sense?我觉得整句意思就是只要大学选择给社团钱不是因为社团的views，就可以收，跟不同意的学生收也可以。至于，大学到底是基于什么标准选择社团可以给钱的就不清楚了
欢迎回复~~

作者: smilinglily814 时间: 2013-3-23 04:46
从Google上找到的：
They do mean the groups' views.

In other words - the university has to be agnostic about giving out the money - it has to fund any group. It can't decide - oh, a group about cat lovers? Great, here's your money. Dog lovers? Sorry, we won't fund you if you like dogs.

So the university can't decide to refuse money if it thinks a particular group's views are bad or wrong or whatever.

_________________
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director of Online Community
ManhattanGMAT

作者: GraceM 时间: 2013-3-25 19:21

smilinglily814 发表于 2013-3-23 04:46
从Google上找到的：They do mean the groups' views.In other words - the university has to be agnostic ...

可是这句话有点不明白的就是：前面是说向学生收费，为什么后来又突然说“得到钱的社团”的意见？
或者说，里面有一个类似隐含的文化背景——学校先向学生收钱，然后把钱平均给社团？？

作者: xiangguoling 时间: 2015-5-17 02:58
Researchers have found that individuals who have been blind from birth, thus never having seen anyone gestures...？
是不是应该改成 thus have never seen anyone gestures?

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)