ChaseDream

标题: GWD4-Q2 [打印本页]

作者: wangrui1008 时间: 2013-1-26 11:27
标题: GWD4-Q2
In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take away the breath of life.

A.in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take

B.where the sky was the floor, having the power to give and to take

C.whose floor was the sky, and who has the power of giving and of taking

D.in which the sky was the floor, with the power of giving and taking
E. whose floor was the sky, having the power to give and take

看了不同资料，A和D都出现做过正确答案，请大神指教，究竟A和D哪个语法有问题呢，顺带讲下B就更好了。大谢！

作者: DesmondWang 时间: 2013-1-26 13:57
in my opinion,A it is!
D的问题在于，这里的with修饰有歧义，到底是sky with the power还是Esaugetu with the power？因为从语法上来说都可以修饰。GMAT doesn't like "with" clauses when a more precise and concise relationship between the two things could be written(这句话来自manhattan的一个instructor)
B的问题在于，原本是两个独立的noun modifier（从A中的and可知），这里改成了V-ing，变成了有联系了。一般来说V-ing是用来修饰preceding clause的，要么是提供addtional information（指前面的动作同时发生的事），要么是前句的结果，那这里逻辑意思就不对了。因为had the power跟sky was the floor或者who dwelt是没有前面所说的两个逻辑关系的。所以eliminate B。
个人意见，不喜请喷

作者: 大石头88 时间: 2014-9-24 23:48

DesmondWang 发表于 2013-1-26 13:57
in my opinion,A it is!D的问题在于，这里的with修饰有歧义，到底是sky with the power还是Esaugetu with t ...

对B的解释很有道理！

作者: 415lethe 时间: 2016-7-25 12:13

DesmondWang 发表于 2013-1-26 13:57
in my opinion,A it is!D的问题在于，这里的with修饰有歧义，到底是sky with the power还是Esaugetu with t ...

想问下：Had the power to give and to take 两个to才能保持平行吗？会不会冗余？
可以是 the power to give and take
好纠结这种平行要不要保留前面的to或者that

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)