标题: OG13-SC128大象进化---OG解释说要用suggest的分词形式修饰前evidence但答案用了动词不定式，疑问~ [打印本页] 作者: lionsue 时间: 2013-1-24 23:20 标题: OG13-SC128大象进化---OG解释说要用suggest的分词形式修饰前evidence但答案用了动词不定式，疑问~ 128. Australian embryologists have found evidencethat suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolvingas a kind of snorkel.
(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved
这道题主要是考suggest后面的平行结构，此处略过不说，我想问的是OG解释里有个小问题，就是下面的黄色部分： It is awkward and confusing to string together relative clauses:evidence that suggests that the elephant. … A clearer way of making this connection is to turn the verbsuggestsinto a participle modifyingevidence. 他的意思是说要把suggest变为分词去修饰evidence，但是下面的答案E中用的是to suggest，这个算是用动词不定式去修饰evidence了吧？当然了我理解为find evidence to suggest 结构好像挺对的，但OG的这个解释又是什么意思呢？是不是意味着我把答案改成suggesting that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved也对？
即原句改为：Australian embryologists have found evidence suggesting that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.也对吧？ 作者: zcdzheng 时间: 2013-4-26 16:57
额 我觉得用suggesting是对的作者: lvhaomin 时间: 2013-5-5 12:56
zcdzheng 发表于 2013-4-26 16:57
额 我觉得用suggesting是对的
suggesting的解释我认为完全正确。作者: chineuro 时间: 2013-5-5 20:55
OA 是E？
那么我觉得你说的是对的。
