标题: OG13_SC_91 关于they指代和省略的问题 查过CD后自己的结论不知道对否。求解 [打印本页] 作者: zcstc007 时间: 2012-12-22 17:46 标题: OG13_SC_91 关于they指代和省略的问题 查过CD后自己的结论不知道对否。求解 Inanefforttoreduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to see, and they are.
a. have been priced to see, and they are. b. are priced to seLL, and they have c. are priced to sell, and they do d, are being priced to sell, and have e had been priced to sell, and they have
答案C
查了CD， 主要的两个疑问 they 指代谁和do的省略问题。CD上基本是说they指代Italian vintners， do后面省略了sell
我当时自己做题的时候想法是 省略的是 been priced to sell。 所以我如果修改一下大家帮我看下对不对
Inanefforttoreduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; The wines of Italian have been priced to sell, and have.
红色部分是我修改的， 这样一来我想表示的是这批酒被降价出售，并且确实被降价出售了， 后面逗号加and句子的主语就是the wines of Italian所以我省略掉了， have后面省略了 been priced to sell.
这样可以吗 求解作者: TerraceHo 时间: 2012-12-23 01:55 Inanefforttoreduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; The wines of Italian have been priced to sell, and have.
1、如果and連接兩個簡短的動作，中間不應該加comma 2、subject錯了，應該是the wines of italian vinters。但是這樣wordy，用third person personal pronoun-their較優 3、如果後面用的是have的話，表示have後面省略的是been priced to sell，這樣補全原句，and前後的謂語成份就是一樣的不對；另外，我覺得and後面的內容偏向于強調它是一個事實，所以用simple present會好一點吧。 4、我覺得這種強調的用法，適用於一個完整的句子中，比如說題幹用的是they do，而不僅僅是do；所以lz的句子如果用have的話，也應該是they have.