ChaseDream
标题: OG 164 [打印本页]
作者: rt316 时间: 2003-7-8 04:10
标题: OG 164
164. The commission proposed that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year. is obtained through a local bond issue.
(A)that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year, is
(B)that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public early next year, be
(C)funding for the development of the park, perhaps open to the public early next year, to be
(D)funds for the park's development, perhaps open to the public early next year, be
(E)development funding for the park, which could be open to the public early next year, is to be
Choice B is best. Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be open ... to the noun development, when, in fact, it is the park that could be open. Choice C omits that, the object of proposed that is needed to introduce the clause describing the proposal. C also uses to be unidiomatically where be is correct: the commission proposed [that] funding ... to be obtained is wrong. Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps open to the public ... to modify development; the phrase should modify park. Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public ....
解释里最后一句话不懂,E里which从句不是紧跟park的么,为什么说会引起歧义呢?
作者: siebel 时间: 2003-7-8 07:52
马后炮。
,which应该修饰前面的中心词,e选项的中心词是:funding。而funding could be open to the public 逻辑意思不同的说。
作者: redz11 时间: 2003-7-8 11:44
e中which 修饰park没错,我觉得最大的问题是‘development funding’ and‘is to be ’ 。
作者: tocean0222 时间: 2003-7-8 12:28
以下是引用stoneren在2003-7-8 4:10:00的发言:
Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public ....
解释里最后一句话不懂,E里which从句不是紧跟park的么,为什么说会引起歧义呢?
1、因为E没有了that,development funding就变为是the commission proposed,而不是be obtained through local bonds,这样一来,development funding作为proposed
的宾语成为中心词,被which修饰,所以引起歧义;
2、E还有个错误是句子出现2个谓语:proposed和is;
作者: greattaste 时间: 2003-7-8 23:20
关于中心词的问题
在B和C中, 都是A of B的结构, 应该A是中心词, 所以后面的non-restrictive clause以及同谓语应该都是修饰A吧? 为什么在本题中却都是正确的呢?
作者: tocean0222 时间: 2003-7-9 00:37
以下是引用greattaste在2003-7-8 23:20:00的发言:
关于中心词的问题
在B和C中, 都是A of B的结构, 应该A是中心词, 所以后面的non-restrictive clause以及同谓语应该都是修饰A吧? 为什么在本题中却都是正确的呢?
good question,但注意B中用的是which引导的非限定从句,因此按就近修饰原则修饰park!
作者: gsluo 时间: 2003-7-9 16:42
其实通过propose that (should)...可以排除其余而剩B、D。
另外,D中PERHAPS 过于口语,ETS不倾向使用。所以选B
作者: braveMBA 时间: 2003-7-9 23:59
以下是引用tocean0222在2003-7-9 0:37:00的发言:
good question,但注意B中用的是which引导的非限定从句,因此按就近修饰原则修饰park!
这个原则似乎还是在不同的地方有不同的解释,挺讨厌的,包括限定性定语从句that的修饰对象问题,也不是绝对的原则。所以,好的做法还是从句子意思去排除选项。
作者: siebel 时间: 2003-7-10 00:19
好的做法还是从句子意思去排除选项
totally agree! 不过,我一直担心,现场一时半会儿在拿不出意思的情况下,怎么办。这时候,如果把这些规则搞清楚了的话,就容易做对题了。
作者: rattledrum 时间: 2008-7-16 21:41
以下是引用tocean0222在2003-7-8 12:28:00的发言:以下是引用stoneren在2003-7-8 4:10:00的发言:
Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public ....
解释里最后一句话不懂,E里which从句不是紧跟park的么,为什么说会引起歧义呢?
1、因为E没有了that,development funding就变为是the commission proposed,而不是be obtained through local bonds,这样一来,development funding作为proposed
的宾语成为中心词,被which修饰,所以引起歧义;
2、E还有个错误是句子出现2个谓语:proposed和is;
版主说得就是没错
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |