ChaseDream

标题: 求个援手，这题怎么都觉得E舒服。 [打印本页]

作者: AmoHolmes 时间: 2012-12-11 03:07
标题: 求个援手，这题怎么都觉得E舒服。
A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could

答案D.

还有这道
1.According to the professor’s philosophy, the antidote to envy is one’s own work, always one’s own work: not thinking about it, not assessing it, but simply doing it.

(A) one’s own work, always one’s own work: not thinking about it, not assessing it, but simply doing it

(B) always work; because you don’t think about it or assess it, you just do it

(C) always one’s own work: not thinking about or assessing it, but simply to do it

(D) not to think or assess, but doing one’s own work（A）

(E) neither to think about one’s own work nor to assess it, it is always simply doing it

C为什么不好呢>?/

作者: kiwifoodtown 时间: 2012-12-11 10:05
1. E 选项中不应该是 the power stations would or could be made sufficiently safe in the future。而是nuclear power stations。所以错。

2. not doing, but doing平行而C选项中 not doing, but to do不平行。而且去掉了前面的one’s own work，就完全改变了句意了。

作者: AmoHolmes 时间: 2012-12-11 10:54

1. E 选项中不应该是 the power stations would or could be made sufficiently safe in the future。而是nuclear power stations。所以错。

2. not doing, but doing平行而C选项中 not doing, but to do不平行。而且去掉了前面的one’s own work，就完全改变了句意了。

-- by 会员 kiwifoodtown (2012/12/11 10:05:50)

谢谢. 但第一个中will 和could感觉事态上有出入啊. power stations 少了nuclear是症结么?

第二个理解了C不好,但感觉A重复好多.

作者: DUKB24 时间: 2012-12-11 11:37
这两道题是官方的题原？

怎么感觉一点印象都没有？

LZ可以确认下？

不学习官方的题原感觉效果不会特别好

作者: kiwifoodtown 时间: 2012-12-11 14:19

-- by 会员 kiwifoodtown (2012/12/11 10:05:50)

谢谢. 但第一个中will 和could感觉事态上有出入啊. power stations 少了nuclear是症结么?

第二个理解了C不好,但感觉A重复好多.

-- by 会员 AmoHolmes (2012/12/11 10:54:03)

1.电站和核电站完全不同，因为前面说的所有的问题都是核电的安全问题，后面只说电站的话就严重违背了句意了。

2.有些重复是必须的，就像我们经常会说类似的话，比如：我们看到的一切绝不是我们所看到一切。

作者: AmoHolmes 时间: 2012-12-12 01:41

这两道题是官方的题原？

怎么感觉一点印象都没有？

LZ可以确认下？

不学习官方的题原感觉效果不会特别好

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/12/11 11:37:31)

感谢指导~~~是有人贴出来的<语法大全987> 这个行么?>

作者: AmoHolmes 时间: 2012-12-12 01:42

-- by 会员 kiwifoodtown (2012/12/11 10:05:50)

谢谢. 但第一个中will 和could感觉事态上有出入啊. power stations 少了nuclear是症结么?

第二个理解了C不好,但感觉A重复好多.

-- by 会员 AmoHolmes (2012/12/11 10:54:03)

-- by 会员 kiwifoodtown (2012/12/11 14:19:46)

这是要进入哲学高度么.....= =!感谢了~~

作者: AmoHolmes 时间: 2012-12-12 01:44

这两道题是官方的题原？

怎么感觉一点印象都没有？

LZ可以确认下？

不学习官方的题原感觉效果不会特别好

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/12/11 11:37:31)

官方题原指的prep么? 那个做完了. 有什么可以推荐的么? SC超烂啊

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)