98. The financial crash of October 1987 demonstrated that the world's capital markets are integrated more closely than never before and events in one part of the global village may be transmitted to the rest of the village--almost instantaneously.
(A) integrated more closely than never before and
(B) closely integrated more than ever before so
(C) more closely integrated as never before while
(D) more closely integrated than ever before and that
(E) more than ever before closely integrated as
Choice D, the best answer, produces a clear sentence in which parallel structure (two clauses introduced by that) underscores meaning: the crash demonstrated [1] that markets are integrated and [2] that events may be transmitted.
看了很久都不是很明白为什么要加那个that ggjj帮忙小弟分析一下 xiexie
没什么为什么可不可以
一定要这样 记住就是了
that引导的两个宾语从句句的并列平行结构
the crash demonstrated [1] that markets are integrated and [2] that events may be transmitted
平行要注意一下几点：
1.结构形式上尽量保持一致：-ing and -ing; to+v. and to + v.;
2.功能上尽量相同：定语与定语（定语与宾语相并列明显错误）；
3. 逻辑意思上不能有歧义
谢谢大家 明白了
还是有点疑惑:
2.功能上尽量相同：定语与定语（定语与宾语相并列明显错误):
the crash demonstrated [1] that markets are integrated and [2] that events may be transmitte中: 如果改成
the crash demonstrated [1] that markets are integrated and [2] events may be transmitted为什么会被理解为是定语与宾语相并列?
Up by myself.
Who can help me, or the question is too stupid?
demonstrated events may be transmitted，后面是定语。demonstrated that markets are integrated ，后面是一个宾语从句。
10楼说：demonstrated events may be transmitted，后面是定语。demonstrated that markets are integrated ，后面是一个宾语从句。
我不理解为什么前者就是定语了呢？而不是一个省略了that的宾语从句？
我觉得OG的解释是说：D选项实现了两个从句的“that”的parallelism固然是最好，但是并不是选择它的必要理由，而是因为其他四个选项都有除此之外的其他问题。
我理解如果D选项没有that，其他选项维持不变的话，这道题也只能选D了。
请NN指正！
有个问题：demonstrated that and that是并列的说法，那么如果表示转折的说法，demonstrated that while that这种说法对么？我考试的时候就越到这种题目，具体不记得了，但是其他的选项都错的特别明显，只有这个我没办法判断，结果就选了这个。while也可以做连词么？
再问个问题与结构和逻辑有关.
(B) closely integrated more than ever before so
且不考虑 closely integrated more than 应改为 more closely integrated than 的错误. 为什么 so 不行? Or why this sentence has to be considered a parallel structure? Just because the choice A seems to indicate a paralle structure and the original sentence shall be maintained as much as possible?
Can I understand this sentence as:
1. 这句只有一个宾语,所有demonstrated that后的内容作为宾语
2. 宾语部分是" x so y" 结构
这逻辑也讲的通.
The financial crash of October 1987 demonstrated that the world's capital markets are closely integrated more than ever before so events in one part of the global village may be transmitted to the rest of the village--almost instantaneously.
请指教
再问个问题与结构和逻辑有关.
(B) closely integrated more than ever before so
且不考虑 closely integrated more than 应改为 more closely integrated than 的错误. 为什么 so 不行? Or why this sentence has to be considered a parallel structure? Just because the choice A seems to indicate a paralle structure and the original sentence shall be maintained as much as possible?
Can I understand this sentence as:
1. 这句只有一个宾语,所有demonstrated that后的内容作为宾语
2. 宾语部分是" x so y" 结构
这逻辑也讲的通.
The financial crash of October 1987 demonstrated that the world's capital markets are closely integrated more than ever before so events in one part of the global village may be transmitted to the rest of the village--almost instantaneously.
请指教
我個人覺得 so在這裡應該是可以的
因為邏輯上說的通 文法上也沒有什麼不對
不過剛剛想到如果改成so的話 後面的-almost*** 會不會造成ambi阿?
可是後來又覺得 如果會ambi的話 不管so還是and that都會才對
因此個人覺得應該是可以的
請NN指教
而且也表示兩個that的內容屬於同一個層次
就算在(A)and (B)so (C)while (E)as 前面加上逗號, 結構上看似正確, 但語意不合
變成跟主要句子並列: the financial crash..., and events may be...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |