ChaseDream

标题: （请教）LSAT1-4-22 [打印本页]

作者: concong 时间: 2004-11-13 12:57
标题: （请教）LSAT1-4-22
22. It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.

Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?

(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.

(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.

(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.

(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.

(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate

答案A 高不清楚关系

作者: cranberry 时间: 2004-11-13 14:42
这个题目目前没有非常令人满意的解释,你可以搜索一下.

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-11-13 19:57

1。问题：该问题大类对类似逻辑错误。但形式不同传统的类似逻辑错误。问题要你找那个选项犯了作者描述的逻辑错误

2。作者描述的逻辑错误：作者在第一句话描述了该逻辑错误（后面的话是对该逻辑错误的评价）。该逻辑错误为：仅仅从一个结果知道一个因，从该因推出另外一个不同的果。注意：该逻辑推理有三个因素：一个因，一个看到的果，一个推理出来的果。拿这三个元素去选项对。（注意不一定要清楚什麽逻辑错误，只要类似就行）

3。A。一个看到的果，一个推理的果。一个因。正确。

B。两个看到的果。错

C。看到的果和推理的果不同因。错

D。同C

E。有两个看到的果。原文是ONLY PARTICULAR EFFECT

作者: concong 时间: 2004-11-14 10:58
标题: （请教）LSAT1-4-22
多谢！

作者: snowjing 时间: 2005-9-16 03:23
Lawyer的解释真的太经典了，情不自禁赞一把！

作者: celina1983 时间: 2005-9-16 23:20
lawyer 好厉害~

作者: 寂寞的声音 时间: 2005-10-6 10:44
不明白A中那个是推理的果，那个是因。

作者: xjlv128 时间: 2006-3-15 18:15
啊……还有这种题！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)