In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter. In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for (20) political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances. Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of(/on?) systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
24-25: According to the passage, which of the following is true of the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War?
A) It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.
B) It represented a compromise between Du Bois’ own views and those of Trotter.
C) It represented a significant redefinition of the long-term goals Du Bois held prior to the war.
D) It was advocated by Du Bois in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war.
E) It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.
答案给的是E，看了几遍还是没明白，在原文中如何定位
没人理啊
reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
Guess this is it.
up
我也正对25题发呆那，我认为答案应为C。
文章的意思是非抵抗是W.E.B. Du Bois的一贯主张，只是因为其他原因他才临时改变了主意，所以当1918年他变回一贯主张时大家都吃了一惊。
猜想可能原因
選項A) It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.
原文In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter. 所以A不對
今天做了这篇,发现找不到好的解释,大家来一起讨论一下,我又仔细读了文章,我是这么看的:
从文中这句可以看出,D B 一定没有HOLD坚定的主张:In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15)
那么表叙他以前有不变主张的选项A,C 错.
B是明显错
而在D,E中选择, 而C中in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war ,文中也没说是以为这个他才改变成妥协派的,
那么就剩E了,这个文章后面可能输入得不是很完整,所以我现在的意见就是答案E .
不知道这是哪个gwd里的，以前没做过，我觉得这个句子是不是错了：没有主语，断句也不对吧。不过应该是这个意思：这个1918年的editorial不是一个长期目标的改变，而是一个基于现实利益的反应，因为黑人以前通过在战争中的付出得到了更多法律和政治权利。
(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
Bois老兄的行径：
1895：支持温和派的W
1903：支持激进派的T，因为T和他讲了W的行径
1918：也就是本文讨论的这个时期，bois又支持温和政策，因为the past war taught him that AA could get legal and political advances if they contributed
1918后：文章结尾再次揭露bois老兄的多变，因为战争中的歧视问题，他又要return fighting
所以，
A：说"一贯"反对是错的，bois是个来回变的人，1918editorial只是他上一个阶段反对的（1903－1918）
B：说1918editorial是bois和激进派的妥协，显然说反了，1918E是接近温和派观点的。
C：说这是bois长期目标的改变，显然这位老兄从来没有什么长期目标。
D：说1918E是军队中歧视问题的产物。也是错的。军队中的歧视问题是在1918E之后发生的。正是因为军中歧视问题，使bois从他1918E的观点又转向激进派。
E：应的就是我说有问题的那句话。bois从以前的经验中得出，在这个时局下黑人放弃国内斗争，和白人共赴国难，能给黑人带来政治和法律上的好处。这就是他这个strategy的pragmatic之处
选E
强烈支持philikittist的详细解答,谢谢谢谢
philikittist 解答的好详细
佩服phil mm可以从词中看出答案来。。。
那么，你罗列的那一系列事件，是不是说明了26题应该选A
24-26: The passage is primarily concerned with
A) identifying historical circumstances that led Du Bois to alter his long-term goals.
B) defining “accommodationism” and showing how Du Bois used this strategy to achieve certain goals.
C) accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.
D) contesting the view that Du Bois was significantly influenced by either Washington or Trotter.
E) assessing the effectiveness of a strategy that Du Bois urged African Americans to adopt.
我觉得，文章的中心是1918E，不是bois这个人整个的变化历程。
文章不是按顺序罗列bois的变化过程写的，而是开头就讲1918editorial，后面讲bois从前到后的观点变化，只是解释了bois做出1918E并不是什么反常的事情。
先不管A用这个可能并不存在的long goal是否恰当。看A落在circumstances上，我就觉得不对。因为中心是a position－1918E。
以前有人同样问我：机灵鼠不是只鼠GG吗？ 呵呵
再一次看出来，phi mm从词中看出乾坤，不得不PF
对于猫猫施主的解释只能说佩服佩服！
正在困惑中,十分感谢猫猫施主.
In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions
less for因为意识形态上的原因（W的accommodationist view)，than because...
再读一遍。
In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War.
1918年的社论中，DB建议与白人团结。
The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington.
人们对此大感意外，因为DB原被认为是一个不妥协的领袖，并反对TW。
In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter.
实际上，DB总转换观点。
In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for (20) political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech.
1895年时支持W。
In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.
1903年，DB反对W，并出于非意识形态原因。
(20)Reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
这只是一种实际考量，并不是长期目标的改变。
Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however.
但DB并没有坚持很久。
Upon learning of(/on?) systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
此后，DB又转向放对战争。
读文章的时候觉得自己基本明白了,可是这篇居然全部做错!!!
一是细节的地方没注意到,导致一些关键的细节点没有把握...
二是文章的整体结构也就是行文架构不清晰,只知道这个鬼人变来变去变得我晕死了...还是猫猫施主分析的好,我做主题T时就只注意到全文是在介绍这个人的观点变化过程呢...真是差距啊!
这篇不难的文章又被我顶出来了,不好意思啊...
厄....
没注意到斑斑就在我前面发的解释,又犯傻了...
谢谢斑竹详细的解释
这句句子没读懂，可不可以请NN分析一下语法结构。谢谢
Reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances.
文章中间的一大段根本就不只所云~~
全军覆没了~
这句句子没读懂，可不可以请NN分析一下语法结构。谢谢
Reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened. African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances.
我 怎么觉得那应该有个句号～
作的时候小D的变来变去到是弄懂了，不过Reflected那句是在是不好读，彻底被弄晕了，直接导致25题花了许多时间确定不了答案。
这题够讨厌的。
能不能寄一份, GWD24 给我. lanserlong(A) hotmail.com
谢了!
第一次做错1个。第二次做---全错
多谢斑斑的精彩讲解！这种文简单题难的最恶了
版主太伟大了~~~
先谢谢猫猫施主的详细解释,对文章的结构分析很清晰.
但还有个疑问:
E) It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.
在文章中定位的那句话是(30)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
但这道题的问题是问的which of the following is true of the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War? 如果是发生在一次大战期间的事情,那关past wars什么事情呢? 除非这个wars指的其他很多战争,但文章中并没有提到其他战争啊? 所以我同意选D,但认为答案还是有些缺陷.
不知道这是哪个gwd里的，以前没做过，我觉得这个句子是不是错了：没有主语，断句也不对吧。不过应该是这个意思：这个1918年的editorial不是一个长期目标的改变，而是一个基于现实利益的反应，因为黑人以前通过在战争中的付出得到了更多法律和政治权利。
(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
Bois老兄的行径：
1895：支持温和派的W
1903：支持激进派的T，因为T和他讲了W的行径
1918：也就是本文讨论的这个时期，bois又支持温和政策，因为the past war taught him that AA could get legal and political advances if they contributed
1918后：文章结尾再次揭露bois老兄的多变，因为战争中的歧视问题，他又要return fighting
所以，
A：说"一贯"反对是错的，bois是个来回变的人，1918editorial只是他上一个阶段反对的（1903－1918）
B：说1918editorial是bois和激进派的妥协，显然说反了，1918E是接近温和派观点的。
C：说这是bois长期目标的改变，显然这位老兄从来没有什么长期目标。
D：说1918E是军队中歧视问题的产物。也是错的。军队中的歧视问题是在1918E之后发生的。正是因为军中歧视问题，使bois从他1918E的观点又转向激进派。
E：应的就是我说有问题的那句话。bois从以前的经验中得出，在这个时局下黑人放弃国内斗争，和白人共赴国难，能给黑人带来政治和法律上的好处。这就是他这个strategy的pragmatic之处
选E
有理！
less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him
A. It underwent a shift in 1903 for reasons Other than Du Bois’ disagreement with
这里other than 对应less for ... than because....
Furthermore, Du Bois
believed that African Americans’
contributions to past war efforts had
brought them some legal and political
(40) advances.
E. It was advocated by Du Bois in part
because of his historical knowledge
of gains (African Americans had made)
during past wars.
先谢谢猫猫施主的详细解释,对文章的结构分析很清晰.
但还有个疑问:
E) It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.
在文章中定位的那句话是(30)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
但这道题的问题是问的which of the following is true of the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War? 如果是发生在一次大战期间的事情,那关past wars什么事情呢? 除非这个wars指的其他很多战争,但文章中并没有提到其他战争啊? 所以我同意选D,但认为答案还是有些缺陷.
ding.....
定位在最後一句:Upon learning of systematic discrimination......
so, pick D.
(30)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
这句话我觉得应该是这个样子的：
(30)Reflected
（分词状语，逻辑主语为African American' contributions) not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened(修饰pressure), African Americans'contributions（主语） to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
开始这句话没有读得很明白 后来发现少了标点符号（，） 然后首字母R应该大写。 不知道理解得对不对？
不知道这是哪个gwd里的，以前没做过，我觉得这个句子是不是错了：没有主语，断句也不对吧。不过应该是这个意思：这个1918年的editorial不是一个长期目标的改变，而是一个基于现实利益的反应，因为黑人以前通过在战争中的付出得到了更多法律和政治权利。
(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
Bois老兄的行径：
1895：支持温和派的W
1903：支持激进派的T，因为T和他讲了W的行径
1918：也就是本文讨论的这个时期，bois又支持温和政策，因为the past war taught him that AA could get legal and political advances if they contributed
1918后：文章结尾再次揭露bois老兄的多变，因为战争中的歧视问题，他又要return fighting
所以，
A：说"一贯"反对是错的，bois是个来回变的人，1918editorial只是他上一个阶段反对的（1903－1918）
B：说1918editorial是bois和激进派的妥协，显然说反了，1918E是接近温和派观点的。
C：说这是bois长期目标的改变，显然这位老兄从来没有什么长期目标。
D：说1918E是军队中歧视问题的产物。也是错的。军队中的歧视问题是在1918E之后发生的。正是因为军中歧视问题，使bois从他1918E的观点又转向激进派。
E：应的就是我说有问题的那句话。bois从以前的经验中得出，在这个时局下黑人放弃国内斗争，和白人共赴国难，能给黑人带来政治和法律上的好处。这就是他这个strategy的pragmatic之处
选E
牛人
恶心的文章 谢谢
我觉得此文说DB这个人就是个墙头草，他觉得黑人兄弟亏了他就要斗，他觉得他们赚了他就乖一点，在1918年的时候他提出了和平共处的政策是因为他部分认识到黑人兄弟在一战中赚了。
AC项说他一直采取一个策略，显然不对，B项也可以排除，
D项中说他认识到在一战中黑人受到歧视，那么亏了肯定要斗，是不可能妥协的，
只有E正确，呵呵胡乱诌几句，见笑见笑
Furthermore, Du Bois
believed that African Americans’
contributions to past war efforts had
brought them some legal and political
(40) advances.
E. It was advocated by Du Bois in part
because of his historical knowledge
of gains (African Americans had made)
during past wars.
E选项的定位点在：
Furthermore, Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances.
A选项中consistently rejected 错
B选项中单看a compromise between Du Bois’ own views and those of Trotter就错，因为Du Bois此时是反对Trorrer的
C选项中的long-term goals，Du Bois根本就没有
D选项中discrimination faced by African Americans during the war使Du Bois called on them to “return fighting” from the war；况且提干中给的是 the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War使Du Bois做出这种举动的必须是战争之前或战争之中的一些经历。
不知道这是哪个gwd里的，以前没做过，我觉得这个句子是不是错了：没有主语，断句也不对吧。不过应该是这个意思：这个1918年的editorial不是一个长期目标的改变，而是一个基于现实利益的反应，因为黑人以前通过在战争中的付出得到了更多法律和政治权利。
(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
Bois老兄的行径：
1895：支持温和派的W
1903：支持激进派的T，因为T和他讲了W的行径
1918：也就是本文讨论的这个时期，bois又支持温和政策，因为the past war taught him that AA could get legal and political advances if they contributed
1918后：文章结尾再次揭露bois老兄的多变，因为战争中的歧视问题，他又要return fighting
所以，
A：说"一贯"反对是错的，bois是个来回变的人，1918editorial只是他上一个阶段反对的（1903－1918）
B：说1918editorial是bois和激进派的妥协，显然说反了，1918E是接近温和派观点的。
C：说这是bois长期目标的改变，显然这位老兄从来没有什么长期目标。
D：说1918E是军队中歧视问题的产物。也是错的。军队中的歧视问题是在1918E之后发生的。正是因为军中歧视问题，使bois从他1918E的观点又转向激进派。
E：应的就是我说有问题的那句话。bois从以前的经验中得出，在这个时局下黑人放弃国内斗争，和白人共赴国难，能给黑人带来政治和法律上的好处。这就是他这个strategy的pragmatic之处
选E
太精彩了，茅塞顿开~~
不知道这是哪个gwd里的，以前没做过，我觉得这个句子是不是错了：没有主语，断句也不对吧。不过应该是这个意思：这个1918年的editorial不是一个长期目标的改变，而是一个基于现实利益的反应，因为黑人以前通过在战争中的付出得到了更多法律和政治权利。
(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
Bois老兄的行径：
1895：支持温和派的W
1903：支持激进派的T，因为T和他讲了W的行径
1918：也就是本文讨论的这个时期，bois又支持温和政策，因为the past war taught him that AA could get legal and political advances if they contributed
1918后：文章结尾再次揭露bois老兄的多变，因为战争中的歧视问题，他又要return fighting
所以，
A：说"一贯"反对是错的，bois是个来回变的人，1918editorial只是他上一个阶段反对的（1903－1918）
B：说1918editorial是bois和激进派的妥协，显然说反了，1918E是接近温和派观点的。
C：说这是bois长期目标的改变，显然这位老兄从来没有什么长期目标。
D：说1918E是军队中歧视问题的产物。也是错的。军队中的歧视问题是在1918E之后发生的。正是因为军中歧视问题，使bois从他1918E的观点又转向激进派。
E：应的就是我说有问题的那句话。bois从以前的经验中得出，在这个时局下黑人放弃国内斗争，和白人共赴国难，能给黑人带来政治和法律上的好处。这就是他这个strategy的pragmatic之处
选E
精彩啊！这种境界太高了！！
In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter. In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for (20) political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions,(30)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened.
African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances. Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of(/on?) systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
Du Bois在一战前后的观点变来变去。
1918年DB反对黑人“惹事生非”，令众人吃惊，因为他们以为他一向和妥协家W作对。其实DB经常在W派和T派间摇摆。在1895年W叫黑人多改善自身社区不要反对歧视的时候，DB是称赞他的。到1903年DB又反对W了，不是因为异见，而是因为听到W压制黑人媒体。这反映了他是因应政府施加的社会压力而改变立场的。黑人的努力改善了自身法律政治地位。DB最后因为知道黑人在军队里受到歧视，再次支持黑人起来战斗。
我的理解：
文章脉络比较复杂，我一直把Washington 当成地点来看了，难怪理解偏差。、原来这个DB是个现实派，才会左右摇摆。看图更清晰：
1895 表扬W
1918号召战争时与白人合作
军队对黑人歧视
24-25: According to the passage, which of the following is true of the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War?
A) It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.
反着说，In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter.
B) It represented a compromise between Du Bois’ own views and those of Trotter.
无关。1918的事情与T无关，张冠李戴。 原文说的是：The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington.
C) It represented a significant redefinition of the long-term goals Du Bois held prior to the war.
无关。上下乱窜 & 发着说，这个long-term goals
是后半段说的，前面1918的时候没提到：
reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response
D) It was advocated by Du Bois in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war.
无关。上下乱窜，这是最后一句话说的后来的事情，在文章结尾处，直接排除。
E) It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.
排除前面4个后，我也很困惑，E 为什么对？这个E里说的内容是文章结尾处说的？貌似与1918无关？
感觉第30句后的句子与前一句接不上，是不是这个考试文章弄来的时候少了几句话？
24-26: The passage is primarily concerned with
A) identifying historical circumstances that led Du Bois to alter his long-term goals.
反着说，原文说此人没有long-term goals
B) defining “accommodationism” and showing how Du Bois used this strategy to achieve certain goals.
无中生有
C) accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.
文章一直都在说这个人变来变去。
D) contesting the view that Du Bois was significantly influenced by either Washington or Trotter.
没说受谁的影响，无中生有
E) assessing the effectiveness of a strategy that Du Bois urged African Americans to adopt.
没说effectiveness，无中生有
24-27: The passage indicates which of the following about Du Bois’ attitude toward Washington?
A) It underwent a shift during the First World War as Du Bois became more sympathetic with Trotter’s views.
一战时的事情与T无关，无中生有。
B) It underwent a shift in 1903 for reasons other than Du Bois’ disagreement with
1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions,
原文同义改写。
C) It underwent a shift as Du Bois make a long-term commitment to the strategy of accommodation.
反着说，DB这个人根本没有长期目标。
D) It remained consistently positive even though Du Bois disagreed with Washington’s efforts to control the African American press.
反着说。实际情况是：1903站到T一起，反对W
E) It was shaped primarily by Du Bois’ appreciation of
张冠李戴，pragmatic
原文第一次出现的时候是来说DB的，在后半段靠近结尾的地方：
reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened
心得：看到一个关键词/中心词，一定回原文看这个词第一次出现的位置，否则很可能是张冠李戴的迷惑选项！
楼上太强了，赞！
10楼分析的好 只有用排除法了么flowerrainn 发表于 2004-11-28 09:22
今天做了这篇,发现找不到好的解释,大家来一起讨论一下,我又仔细读了文章,我是这么看的:从文中这句可以看出, ...
philikittist 发表于 2004-11-28 14:34
不知道这是哪个gwd里的，以前没做过，我觉得这个句子是不是错了：没有主语，断句也不对吧。不过应该是这个 ...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |