ChaseDream

标题: 求助新prep2--227 with逻辑主语问题~~ [打印本页]

作者: caomeifantuan 时间: 2012-11-25 20:29
标题: 求助新prep2--227 with逻辑主语问题~~

The state has proposed new rules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended toensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital

emergency room.

A. rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room

B. rules with the intent of ensuring one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients to be putthrough triage in a hospital emergency room

C. rules intending to ensure at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room put through triage

D. with the intent of ensuring that at least one nurse should be assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room that are put throughtriage

E. and this is intended to ensure one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients put through triagein a hospitalemergency room

问题是这个D.选项的解释：

with the intent做伴随状语修饰前面的分句，逻辑主语不管为rules还是state都错误，当然好像intent不能加the，但我有点不明白逻辑主语不是state嘛？这本来不就是state的意图么？？

求各位大侠帮忙解释~~不胜感激~

作者: caomeifantuan 时间: 2012-11-26 14:35
up~~碰到很多with的题目，总是讲逻辑主语的问题，一直搞不懂~~

作者: GMATEVA 时间: 2012-11-26 21:45
此处 with the intent that 应该是做非限定性修饰前面名词的定语也就是修饰nurse 故错

不确定求拍砖

作者: DUKB24 时间: 2012-11-26 21:57

此处 with the intent that 应该是做非限定性修饰前面名词的定语也就是修饰nurse 故错

不确定求拍砖

-- by 会员 GMATEVA (2012/11/26 21:45:40)

with结构有歧义（可以修饰nurses，或者做adverbial modifier）

而且后面修饰语位置的改变不好，起码没正确选项那么清晰

作者: caomeifantuan 时间: 2012-12-5 23:18
。。错了后来考试焦虑光看寂静去了。。~
原来还是做状语和定语的歧义，之前以为句尾加上逗号了一般就做状语修饰谓语了~~看来选项还是比较出来的。。~~~谢谢版主和长颈鹿童鞋回答~~~

作者: zwhjzwhj 时间: 2015-3-7 22:44
还是没明白，08语法笔记上的这句话
with the intent做伴随状语修饰前面的分句，逻辑主语不管为rules还是state都错误，
什么意思，我怎么觉得不管是rules还是state做逻辑主语都能成立呢，汗，感觉意思上都说的通啊，state propose了一个rules，with表示伴随，with某个intent的propose。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)