很明显要对比各个选项,C选项额:that are disrupted,看到这个就应该有感觉没有B选项concise,当然as的使用咱再来看,这里是定语从句要修饰名词demand,用that might be prompted by colder-than-normal temperatures很明确的that从句作定语修饰demand,而as引导限定定从时需要和 such、 the same 连用,单独使用只能引导非限从句,很明确了选择B
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/11/17 23:46:43)
got it ~~~ 顿悟呐!tks vm!
不过对于那个concise与否的问题还是好难把握哦。。。请问有没有一个比较常用的经验总结?
-- by 会员 windows008 (2012/11/18 0:06:58)
简单一点说吧~
这句话中 leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies
that are disrupted in the Middle East 的that后面的都是修饰supplies,但是vulnerable的原因是hints of disruption,不是hints of supplies~,所以这里不能用定从~
不知道讲的清不清楚~-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/18 15:17:14)