ChaseDream

标题: 请教一个问题。 [打印本页]

作者: 张五大叔    时间: 2012-11-16 22:33
标题: 请教一个问题。
The success of the program to eradicate smallpox has stimulated experts to pursue what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as measles and yaws.



(A) what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as

(B) what they had not previously considered a possibility--better control, if not eradication, of such infections like

(C) something they had not previously considered possible-better control, if not eradication, of such infections as

(D) something not considered a previous possibility--better control and perhaps eradication, of other infections such as

(E) the possibility of what they had not previously considered--better control and possibly eradication of infections like
A选项的错误?

作者: wxtttt    时间: 2012-11-16 23:02
句子结构:The success… has stimulated experts to pursue…
  To pursue something是不定式作补语,后跟定语从句(省略了关系代词that)。
  考点:习惯用语、简洁有效、逻辑表达
  习惯用语-such as,表示举例时用such as,而不是用like。
  简洁有效,谓语动词后直接加形容词作补语;如果能用名词替代一个名词性从句,优先选名词(比如something, probability, likelihood等)。
  逻辑表达,原句的插入语不能随意改为句中并列的成分,会使表达意思改变,而且有些动作是不可能用and连接同时发生的,如本题中的control和eradication。
  (A) something代替名词从句,简洁;the other结构不完整,应该是one… the other搭配。
  (B) consider a possibility表达方式不及直接跟形容词简洁有效;such like搭配错误,应该是such as。
  (C) 正确,if not eradication是插入语,such as…举例。
  (D) consider应直接跟形容词,a previous possibility表达错误且改变了原意;control and perhaps eradication不符合逻辑,改变了原句意思;possibility与perhaps语意重复;other用错,没有搭配对象。
  (E) the possibility of what用法错误,应该用that;possibility与possibly重复;control and eradication不符合逻辑;用like表示举例错误。
  补充说明:
  one… the other 只有两个 some… the others 有三个以上
  one… another,another… some… others,others… others = other people/things the others = the rest 剩余的全部

另外,刚才我也问道的问题,what做宾语不合适




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3