ChaseDream

标题: 请教Verbal Review, CR 第79题 [打印本页]

作者: quoxo 时间: 2012-11-11 22:36
标题: 请教Verbal Review, CR 第79题
79. Consumer health advocate: Your candy company adds caffeine to your chocolate candy bars so that each one delivers aspeci?ed amount of caffeine. Since caffeine is highly addictive, this indicates that you intend tokeepyour customers addicted.

Candy manufacturer: Our manufacturing process results inthere being less caffeine in each chocolate candybarthan in the unprocessed cacao beans from which the chocolate is made.

The candy manufacturer’s response is?awed as a refutation of the consumer health advocate’s argumentbecause it

(A) fails to address the issue of whether the level of caffeine in the candy bars sold by the manufacturer isenough to keep people addicted
(B) assumes without warrant that all unprocessed cacao beans contain auniform amount of caffeine
(C) does not specify exactly how caffeine is lost in the manufacturing process
(D) treats the consumer health advocate’s argument as though it were about each candy bar rather thanabout the manufacturer’s candy in general
(E) merely contradicts the consumer health advocate’s conclusion without giving any reason tobelieve that the advocate’s reasoning is unsound

Argument Evaluation

Situation A candy manufacturer is accused of adding ca?eine, an addictive substance, to its chocolate candy bars with the intent of keeping its customers addicted. The candy manufacturer responds to this accusation by saying that there is less ca?eine in each chocolate candy bar than in the unprocessed cacao beans from which the chocolate is made.

Reasoning What is the ?aw in the candy manufacturer’s response? First consider whether the response indeed refutes the advocate’s charge. In actuality, instead of focusing on the details of the accusation—adding ca?eine to its chocolate bars to keepcustomers addicted—the manufacturer substitutes an entirely di?erent subject, the amount of ca?eine in cacao beans. The manufacturer’s response is a diversion, not an answer.

A Correct. This statement properly identi?es the ?aw in the response. The candy manufacturer does not answer the question whether adding ca?eine to candy bars is designed to make them

addictive.

B Even if the manufacturer did make this assumption, the information is not relevant to the accusation, which is not concerned with naturally occurring ca?eine in cacao beans.
C The precise amount of ca?eine lostin the manufacturing process is not at issue. D The manufacturer does not treat the health advocate’s argument this way.
E The manufacturer does not contradict the accusation, but rather avoids it.

The correct answer is A.

我赞同官方解释：糖果生产商答非所问：The manufacturer’s response is a diversion, not an answer。但是我不理解为什么正确答案是A：糖果的咖啡因含量问题。

作者: HarrisZheng 时间: 2012-11-11 22:44
生产商没有回答咖啡因含量是否导致成瘾性

比如有人说某个姑娘长的不好看然后另外一个人反驳：她比凤姐漂亮

这个道理就跟这题一样比凤姐漂亮不能说明这个姑娘好看所以这个反驳是无力的。

作者: fifiwong 时间: 2012-12-23 11:40

生产商没有回答咖啡因含量是否导致成瘾性

比如有人说某个姑娘长的不好看然后另外一个人反驳：她比凤姐漂亮

这个道理就跟这题一样比凤姐漂亮不能说明这个姑娘好看所以这个反驳是无力的。

-- by 会员 HarrisZheng (2012/11/11 22:44:23)

弱弱的问一下B为什么不对？如果the unprocessed cacao beans的咖啡因含量是超标的，那candy manufacturing指出自己的含量比它的少不是存在flaw么......我感觉同凤姐这个例子一样的呀

作者: HarrisZheng 时间: 2013-1-26 05:31

-- by 会员 HarrisZheng (2012/11/11 22:44:23)

-- by 会员 fifiwong (2012/12/23 11:40:26)

不一样比较的标准（也就是那个凤姐）应该是成瘾的量
不提到这个的都不行

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)