标题: prep2012逻辑29题 [打印本页] 作者: ggr779 时间: 2012-10-31 22:49 标题: prep2012逻辑29题 In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government that are open to the public. Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide? A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers. B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public. C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does. D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking. E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
为什么选c作者: ggr779 时间: 2012-10-31 22:50
upup 求nn作者: ggr779 时间: 2012-10-31 23:18
up作者: HarrisZheng 时间: 2012-11-1 00:20
这题讨论过很多了 用下搜索这么难？作者: ggr779 时间: 2012-11-1 00:46
对楼上的就是那么难，答案和原来讨论的不同，麻烦你不回答也不用这种口气，谢谢。 Reasoning What could make the petition misleading to voters who assumed its purpose was to extend local antismoking ordinances statewide? The petition would mislead such voters if it were not intended to help extend local antismoking ordinances statewide as the voters assumed. The information provided suggests that the petition does genuinely support statewide smoking restriction and that the campaign workers are describing it accurately. But the petition could still mislead the voters if the proposed statewide smoking restriction would actually weaken local smoking ordinances. A. This is a reason to support a smoking ban, not a reason why a petition to implement such a ban would be misleading. B. Voters who assume that the ban would extend local ordinances might not assume that the ban would have a huge impact in rural areas. C. Correct. If the proposed law would supersede and weaken local ordinances, then it would not extend them statewide as the voters assume. Therefore, the petition would be misleading. D. This suggests that most voters would support a statewide smoking ban, not that a petition to implement such a ban would be misleading. E. E This suggests that the state law would be compatible with local ordinances, just as voters who think that the law would extend those ordinances would assume. The correct answer is C.作者: HarrisZheng 时间: 2012-11-2 01:17
伸手党 连搜索的功能都不愿意用 还去读啥MBA作者: ggr779 时间: 2012-11-2 11:10
楼上你是比较空么？ GWD-CR大全里选项是B,PREP2012内为C。只是求证一下有错么。哪里得罪你了。有病。作者: lvning 时间: 2013-4-6 15:02
我也不懂 为什么不选B? 楼主解决了吗作者: 行素 时间: 2019-7-15 07:08