楼主 你问的问题很好！
Besides adding complementary flavors to many foods, hot sauces stimulate the release of endorphins in the brain, just as exercise does, and these have a pain-relieving effect like morphine's.
(A)hot sauces stimulate the release of endorphins in the brain, just as exercise does, and these have a pain-relieving effect like morphine's
(B)hot sauces stimulate the release of endorphins in the brain, like exercise, and they have a pain-relieving effect that is like morphine
(C)hot sauces and exercise both stimulate the release of endorphins in the brain, and they have a pain-relieving effect like morphine
(D)the release of endorphins in the brain is stimulated both by hot sauces and exercise, and they have a pain-relieving effect like morphine's
(E)the release of endorphins in the brain is stimulated by hot sauces, just as with exercise, and these have a pain-relieving effect like that of morphine
Key：A。
这题是个特例 100% 中的 1%
代词不能单独指代 这个原则 始终有效！
但是在这道题目中，我们只能当做 有效性原则 来做，“不可单独指代”在这题中 不是 split
this problem is the only exception we have ever seen to this rule, so we're probably going to leave the general principle in the guide.
i.e., if a rule is correct 99% of the time, then it's a pretty good rule -- the other 1% is an acceptable sacrifice, especially if understanding that 1% would make the other 99% less clear.
if we encounter more exceptions, of course, we will do some serious re-thinking of the issue.
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/besides-adding-complementary-flavors-t3219-15.html
请看最后一楼！
-- by 会员 walt77 (2012/10/31 0:33:47)
thks~~
还有，DUKB我想问你一下你在其它帖子回答别人的一个问题（那个帖子我回复了，不过估计你没看见。。。）
1、In Greek theology the supreme beingwas Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), who dwelt in an upper realm inwhich the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take awaythe breath of life.
A.in which the sky was the floor, and who hadthe power to give and to takeB.where the sky was the floor, having thepower to give and to takeC.whose floor was the sky, and who has thepower of giving and of takingD.in which the sky was the floor, with thepower of giving and takingE.whose floor was the sky, having the power togive and take你的解答是：1. I’m not quite sure whether
where and
in which are interchangeable here... It is not a good split to me
B. there is no ambiguity in
having （it modifies the preceding clause）；the usage of having here does not make sense..we need a
noun modifier
你对B的having理解是不是：既然都是修饰Esaugetu Emissee这个人 ，没有必要一个用who引导的定从来修饰，一个又用ving来修饰（
主系表结构中的句末，ving不表伴随，只起到修饰主句主语的作用是不是？）
另外，关于have the power to do和have the power of doing ，在表示动作的时候，have the power to do是不是应该比have the power of doing 要好？（我在字典中只找到了the power of sth的用法。。。）-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/1 0:14:49)
你的意思是不是：
Ving在句末修饰的时候大多数情况下是包含在从句里当adverbial modifier，但是还是会有少数例外会修饰主句，是
不确定的，但是都对。
但是，with做伴随修饰在句末的时候
一定修饰的是它最近的一个句子preceding clause，一旦有了从句后，是
确定不会修饰主句的？
-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/11/1 9:46:44)