ChaseDream

标题: 求助prep08sc上一个关于than的问题 [打印本页]

作者: wziang 时间: 2012-10-26 23:59
标题: 求助prep08sc上一个关于than的问题
Test1 218题补充说明中，

(OG10-19)In addition to having more protein than wheat does, (B选项)rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.

(GWD-29-24)According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be good for cardiac health.

根据笔记的解释，第一句比较的是protein，所以后面要加上 that in wheat；第二句比较的是wild animals和livestock，所以不加that of在 livestock前。。。可是我的理解是：（取关键词理解）
第一句rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat
第二句wild animals have less total fat than (that of) livestock
两句一个基本一样，一个比较protein，一个比较fat。。。

所以现在懵了。。。求哪位大神来给我解释一下啊。。。跪谢了。。。

作者: sisichen666 时间: 2012-10-27 03:21
宾语比较，一般加that/those，避免歧义
1. In addition to having more protein than wheat does, rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.
假如你这道题，不添加that，则变成rice has protein of higher quality than wheat，产生歧义；
2.wild animals have less total fat than (that of) livestock，假如这道题你不加，不会有任何歧义，主语和主语就同一宾语在比较。。。。。

作者: wziang 时间: 2012-10-27 20:27
那第一句的歧义是什么啊？

rice含protein比含wheat多？

那这么说，第二句不加that of，也有歧义啊，wild animal含脂肪比含牲畜少。。。。

还是不太明白啊，为什么第一句有that in，第二句不能加that of？

作者: wziang 时间: 2012-10-28 18:12
哪位大神来给我解答解答啊，实在是不明白了。。。

作者: sisichen666 时间: 2012-10-28 21:19
1.rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat
2.wild animals have less total fat than livestock
第一句比较的是宾语，要补出that；第二句比较的是主语，不需要补出。根据than前半部分比较级的位置，即可判断要比较的主体，前面是主谓，比较的是主语则不需要补出；前面是主谓宾比较的是宾语时，则需要补出。
但是和您说一句，这种所谓的原则，有时候GMAT本身都会违反，所以确定是不是split，再来定是否语义meaning上有歧义，再定夺是不是要加that或者助动词，千万不要在未划线题目本身钻进去出不来。

作者: DUKB24 时间: 2012-10-28 21:31

1.rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat
2.wild animals have less total fat than livestock
第一句比较的是宾语，要补出that；第二句比较的是主语，不需要补出。根据than前半部分比较级的位置，即可判断要比较的主体，前面是主谓，比较的是主语则不需要补出；前面是主谓宾比较的是宾语时，则需要补出。
但是和您说一句，这种所谓的原则，有时候GMAT本身都会违反，所以确定是不是split，再来定是否语义meaning上有歧义，再定夺是不是要加that或者助动词，千万不要在未划线题目本身钻进去出不来。

-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/28 21:19:43)

多解答点sisi

我这几天空闲比较少

作者: wziang 时间: 2012-10-29 13:12
明白了，谢谢sisi的解答。。。

作者: sisichen666 时间: 2012-10-29 17:46

-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/28 21:19:43)

多解答点sisi

我这几天空闲比较少

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/28 21:31:15)

哎呦。。。。人家最近几门课交essay。。。。晕晕晕呢哦。。。。。

作者: shellin 时间: 2012-11-29 11:17

宾语比较，一般加that/those，避免歧义
1. In addition to having more protein than wheat does, rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.
假如你这道题，不添加that，则变成rice has protein of higher quality than wheat，产生歧义；
2.wild animals have less total fat than (that of) livestock，假如这道题你不加，不会有任何歧义，主语和主语就同一宾语在比较。。。。。

-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/27 3:21:12)

sisi前辈借题再问 C选项为什么不能补充出that of
对于比较结构我背了一个例句便于分析
I eat more than you.
I eat more apple than you do.
规则为主谓结构比较主语时可省略谓语,主谓宾结构比较主语时补充出谓语以便引起歧义.

本题只讨论BC选项
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.

B.wild animals have less less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be
C.wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more fat of a kind thought to be
感觉C的补充更加完善 wild animals have less total fat than livestock会不会给人一种total fat和livestock在比较的感觉?

在引OG原题
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi,

B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,

C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,

D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon, (C)

E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi,
B选项同样省略了但是OG的解释是This sentence claims that plants acquirecarbon more efficiently than they acquirefungi, which is also nonsensical; the form ofcarbon dioxide still modifies fungi.

This sentence claims that plants acquirecarbon more efficiently than they acquirefungi, which is also nonsensical; the form ofcarbon dioxide still modifies fungi.

对此问题有很大疑惑希望能帮我搞定这个部分~~

作者: shellin 时间: 2012-12-1 10:57
求前辈指点啊~~~

作者: Fan5219812 时间: 2014-10-19 12:53

sisichen666 发表于 2012-10-28 21:19
1.rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat2.wild animals have less total fat than lives ...

前辈我想请教一下，这个例子：rice has a protein higher in quality than does wheat. 为什么这里比较主语的时候does要补出，而wild animals 那个例子比较主语的时候谓语就不需要补出呢？

作者: Fan5219812 时间: 2014-10-19 14:35

DUKB24 发表于 2012-10-28 21:31
1.rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat2.wild animals have less total fat than li ...

大D老师，想请问一下这个例子：rice has a protein higher in quality than does wheat. 为什么这里比较主语的时候does要补出，而wild animals have less total fat than livestock 那个例子比较主语的时候谓语就不需要补出呢？

作者: seubomb 时间: 2016-8-17 20:48

Fan5219812 发表于 2014-10-19 14:35
大D老师，想请问一下这个例子：rice has a protein higher in quality than does wheat. 为什么这里比较 ...

我想的是，SC句意优先，你知道这句话代表什么意思，读者也明白就够了，不要太纠结为啥没补出，没补出说明没歧义，这就够了
而你也懂了是否可以补出，还知道补出和没补出有没有区别，有哪些微妙的区别，足矣。。。

作者: 垂钓猫 时间: 2017-11-8 17:42
发表一下个人观点，SC任何时候都是语义优先，没有固定的比较规则。从句意上来理解，rice has a protein higher in quality than does wheat. 这句话是对两种植物的蛋白质进行比较。而wild animals have less total fat than livestock则是旨在说明两种动物的差别。这种省略只要没有造成歧义，都可以跟着语义来判断

作者: firexxfire 时间: 2020-4-17 16:25

垂钓猫发表于 2017-11-8 17:42
发表一下个人观点，SC任何时候都是语义优先，没有固定的比较规则。从句意上来理解，rice has a protein hig ...

同意！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)