ChaseDream

标题: 求助GWD20 19题 [打印本页]

作者: 花花臭臭    时间: 2012-10-24 18:35
标题: 求助GWD20 19题
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?



A.Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.

B.Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.

C.Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.

D.People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

我选的B, 答案是C.
C是说有嗜酒毛病的人去隐藏病情,哪里削弱了呢?
作者: heron25    时间: 2014-7-20 09:08
我觉得是因为结论是:因为有嗜酒毛病的人更容易再次染上酒瘾,为了降低事故率,雇主就应该禁止雇佣有嗜酒毛病的人。
C选项,因为酒瘾者隐瞒病情,所以即使雇主禁止,仍然无法降低事故率。从而这个argument结论就不对了。
而选项B,并不影响降低事故率的可能性,所以没有削弱。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3