ChaseDream

标题: NMGMADMAN的作文贴。不管有没有人拍砖,我心依旧。 [打印本页]

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-22 13:13
标题: NMGMADMAN的作文贴。不管有没有人拍砖,我心依旧。
还有14天就考托福，第五次考了，不想再失败了。每天至少写一篇然后认真修改，监督自己。人言力耕者，岁旱亦有粮。

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-22 13:14
Do you agree or disagree? It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends.

The importance of friendship have been emphasized countless times by people. Undoubtedly we have reached the consensus that friendship has been the most important, if not, among the most important ingredients of lives of people. However, the issue comes with, should we focus on keeping old buddies or making new one? I, as someone who easily falling into mood of nostalgia, tend to exert most efforts on keeping relationship with old friends.

Friendship is valued for its "quality", instead of "quantity". Driven by the modern social development, the pace of life has been accelerated to an unprecedented extent. People especially grownup bear more pressure and tend to live more dependently than ever before, resulting in significant feeling of loneliness. Even though we may meet lots of new people during daily life, in business, in gym, or in a dinner. We may say hello, shake hands, talk and kill time, hardly do we really reveal the real minds of us---as they don't really know us, that's just social intercourse. By the time we're really in trouble, we're down or we are facing setbacks on our works, it's those old friends who can really understand us, who can rely on and who save us from disappointment. When we experiencing embarrassed situation , having a nice dream last night, or meeting someone that we're kind of into, it's those friends we'd love to share with, in spite of good one or bad one, it's always the most pleasant experience that someone can share your happiness and bear your sorrow.

Friendship is also valued for "maintainance", other than "replace". Ubiquitous the experience is that many people may have encountered such situation, Getting a stack of business cards after a party, but hardly you can recognize who is it just a few days later. People are always chasing for what they have not have yet, while easy to ignore those they have had, and that's not the way of fostering friendship. After I went abroad towards US, I got so busy catching my school schedule that somehow contact minor times with my old guys who have been my best friends in college. Once we met on the facebook and we talk, I felt that we have kind of far away from, not physical distance, but heart. I felt so sad about that and after that, I talk to my old guys routinely and ask each other what's going on recently. So keep an eye on connecting with your old friends, it's more important than make new one.

"Time will tell", that's my motto and something I always believe in. You're less likely to perceive that if a guy would be your friend especially when you just met him/her. According to a psychological research, people tend to conceal their real personalities when they meet someone fresh. However as the time goes by, they are inclined to detach their "makeup" and behave towards their real characteristics. So that's the point I want to emphasize, as I mentioned above, we can share our happiness and sorrow to our old friends because we are so close that we have nothing to conceal. That's the feeling of trustiness, since after such a long relation, you know him well. On the contrary, start to know someone fresh can be time-consuming. Much less, the result may be unpleasant, the one you want to be friends maybe not the one that fit.

To sum it up, it's feasible to make new friends. But, keeping old friends should always be placed as the first priority, and reason is simple--they're more important to you.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-23 10:24
10月22号作文More and more people are spending money on their pets, even though there can be other good ways to spend money.

The statement raises a issue with pet, such as puppies, cats. As soaring population account for pet-keepers, should we spend money on them or doing something else meaningful? The problem can be originated from "Is keeping pets worth spending money?". From my prospective, in most cases, the answer is yes.

To begin with, most of the pet-keepers are those one who enjoy keeping a pet. If by doing so they can achieve intrinsic happiness, their spending can be indentified "worthy". It's those pets who get their accompany everyday and be treated as one of their family members to some extent. They have fun in buying cookies for them, they are willing to spend hundreds of dollars to give their dear pets a vaccine injection. Apparent it is that pets owners should spend money on them.

Beyond the conception of pet itself, some puppies and cats are playing vital role in the lives of some group of people. For example, without their dogs those blind people would lose their way home, old ladies who live alone would lose their accompany, suffering from loneliness. Pets as to those people, likes water as to the plant, indispensable it is. Therefore some amount of money spending on them is in undoubtedly essential budget.

Despite the pleasure and help the pets bring us, there exist tons of reasons to spend on their pets. By raising a pet, a child would start their first lesson of life on how to take care of others. Mary, the daughter of my uncle John, raised a puppy since she's 3 year old, they got along well and played around , fed and bathed the puppy everyday. After she attended the elementary, she was elected as the class monitor as a result of her outstanding warm heart and ability to take care of others. Afterwards, she got along with each kid in her class and became the most favorable girl among them.

In order to be objective, I admit that in some case spending on other things such as donating money to children who live in poor or on tuition of the school would be more meaningful, compared to spending on pets. Nevertheless, pets have been the most loyal and reliable friends of human beings and in most cases, it's worthy of spending on them.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-23 12:20
10月21号综合写作 TPO 7

The professor refutes the points listed in the passage by stating that US companies would eventually accept the certifications issued by an international assessment organization.

First, while the passage considers that consumers in US have no longer believe in ads ,the professor in the listening material, however, argues that consumers treat ads separately. To be specific, US consumers only cast doubt on those ads provided by companies themselves while still trust those certifications issued by international organizations.

Second, the professor continues to the "price" issue, while the passage suggests that US consumers are highly price-sensitive and are most likely to choose those uncertified products which are more cheaper, the professor contends that price would not be consumers' primary concern if the price difference is minor within 5%. The professor also points out that consumers would care about the intrinsic value and the quality of the products, in the case of minor price difference.

Third, while the passages believes that international demand would not be a problem for US companies, the professor refutes that in a totally opposite direction. He says that the key issue is " international competition". He argues that US markets would be crowded into international companies if US companies don't take action to acquire equal certified status. In other words, the US companies would be phase out the market in the long run because lacking of certification would result in less competition force.

According to points listed above, the professor draws the conclusion that US companies would cater to such certification ultimately.

作者: AnthonySummer 时间: 2012-10-24 01:38
粉红色拼写错误(直接修改了)橘红色语法错误（谓语搭配单复数问题、固定搭配、空格多空了一格、逗号句号用错了）红色其他错误黄色精彩句子蓝色建议修改（个人建议，不对的地方多多指教啊）

10月22号作文More and more people are spending money on their pets, even though there can be other good ways to spend money.

The statement raises an issue with pet, such as puppies, cats. As soaring population accounts for pet-keepers, should we spend money on them or doing something else meaningful? The problem can be originated from "Is keeping pets worth spending money?". From my perspective, in most cases, the answer is yes.

To begin with, most of the pet-keepers are those one who enjoys keeping a pet. If by doing so they can achieve intrinsic happiness, their spending can be identified "worthy". It's (指代无对象） those pets who get their company everyday and be treated as one of their family members to some extent. They have fun in buying cookies for them. They are willing to spend hundreds of dollars to give their dead pets a vaccine injection. Apparently it is that pets owners should spend money on them.

Beyond the conception of pet itself, some puppies and cats are playing a vital role in the lives of some group of people. For example,（逻辑错误） without their dogs those blind people would lose their way home, （无连接词） old ladies who live alone would lose their company, suffering from loneliness. Pets as to those people, likes water as to the plant, indispensable it is. Therefore some amount of money spending on them is undoubtedly essential budget.

Despite the pleasure and help the pets bring us, there exist tons of reasons to spend on their pets. By raising a pet, a child would start their first lesson of life on how to take care of others. Mary, the daughter of my uncle John, raised a puppy since she's 3 years old, they got along well and played around, fed and bathed the puppy everyday. After she attended the elementary, she was elected as the class monitor as a result of her outstanding warm heart and ability to take care of others. Afterwards, she got along with each kid in her class and became the most favorable girl among them.

In order to be objective, I admit that in some case spending on other things such as donating money to children who live in poor or on tuition of the school would be more meaningful, compared to spending on pets. Nevertheless, pets have been the most loyal and reliable friends of human beings and in most cases, it's worth of spending on them.

貌似小问题比较多~

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-24 06:51
谢谢SUMMER, 好多小问题自己还真是不看不知道啊。。。我离28分还有多远= =

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-24 10:52
10月23日 There's no reason to be impolite to the other people. 超时了10分钟才写了300字出头感觉自己总是在斟酌= =没有文思如泉涌的感觉

When it comes to the issue that should we show impoliteness in some circumstances, proponents may argue that it's natural impetus of human beings to be impolite towards those people who do not deserve respect. Reasonable it is may appear at first glance, however, it's gratuitous and ridiculous upon further inspection. Reasons or explanations will be shown in the following.

First and foremost, impoliteness never solve any problems. Take one simple example, my brother-in-law just bought a cellphone from a phone store, however, the machine crushed 3 days after purchase. He got really angry and came to the store, spoke rudely to the salesman who handed that phone to him 3 days ago. The salesman then charged my brother for personal insult. My brother eventually got his cellphone changed a new one, however, got a warning from police as well. Angry may be the first reaction when we come to situation like this, but behave angrily and impolitely never really solve problems, on the contrary, make things worse.

Moreover, what you're doing to others would reflect to yourself. Respecting others, Showing politeness, these things are actually mutually processed. When you smile to the people, you will receive a smile as well. When you say thank you after someone helped you, they would be willing to help you next time. When you behave impolitely to someone, however, that one will return you in the same way. Worse maybe, people who witnessed your behavior may keep away from you.

To be frankly, it's impossible for everyone keep rational all the time. Such impetus, misbehavior, maybe happen sometime, but, learn to control your temper. The evolvement of human beings, from gorilla, to people in today, we are civilized creatures. A lot of cases, you may be marked as lacking of civilization or missing parenting education.

To sum it up, it's never been a wise move to behavior impoliteness under highly civilized society of today.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-25 06:39
10月24日 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government and corporation should share all their scientific discoveries with other countries in the world? Please use specific details and examples to support your opinion.

An ongoing topic has been debated hotly recently, which says: should government and corporation share their scientific discoveries with others in the world?

Proponents may argue that would enhance the worldwide average productivity, thus offers better well-beings to people all over the world. Reasonable it may appears at first glance, but upon further inspection, it's has several apparent fallacy. Reasons and examples are shown as follow.

First and foremost, not only such "altruism" would not help to enhance comprehensive well-beings of people, but also, indeed, it may probably damage those people, leading them into starvation and poverty. The reason is that such generous share would restrain those scientists in receptive countries from creativity and diligence. Just imagine, if scientists in other countries have don't have to worry about our livelihood at all because they can count on the free dividend other scientists give them, what a chaos the world would be? There would be no one willing to work anymore because they are able to gain without pay. That's definitely not the rule how the world runs and extremely ridiculous.

Moreover, such share in terms of technology may threat harmony and peace of this planet. Take one simple example, right now some powerful countries have achieved the core technique of nuclear weapon. Following this statement, they should share them with the rest of countries. Can you imagine what would happen afterwards? Those terrorists may take advantage of this thus threatening our lives. If every single person in this planet under the threat of death, how come would they achieve more well-being?

To be objective, I'm not stating that those governments and corporations should withhold all of their discoveries to all the countries. In some cases, such support regarding technology would actually help those poor countries enhance their productivity, which may avoid more people starving or frozen to death.

All in all, according to what I listed above, I support that corporations and government should, in most cases, don't share their technologies with other countries.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-26 02:34
作文到底多少字才算比较好啊郁闷写的好少

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-26 10:13
今天状态不好，不知所云。

When compared with job and social life, which are two indispensable ingredients of human beings, many people may prefer social life more because social life can easily be associated with relax, pleasure, new friend, excitement, etc. From my point of view, job, would bring me more happiness than social life.

First and foremost, work time accounts for most of the time of a grownup. One has to work hard to make living. More importantly, working is a mutual process between a job position and a man. A man would like to choose a job which interests and fulfill him. A job position, however, are looking for a man competent for it. Such perfect match would help one man easily engaged in his role in job, working with passion and creativity. Thus one can enjoy the sense of achievement and fulfillment brought by devotion in the field of one's interest. Take me as an example, last semester I joined a part-time job to be assistant of my professor, working on a project regarding valuation of a firm. I'm totally caught by my job because this field is so attractive and it's such a satisfaction each time I got progression of the project. I don't even want move when I sat down and concentrated on my project, let alone went to social.

Moreover, in my opinion, job is actually part of social life. Distinctive from the real social life, which happiness and joy are always transient, social life in job means getting along with you colleagues when you go to work. Your workmates are someone you'll see everyday and directly decides whether you would have a pleasant work time or not. If you can stay in harmonious with your colleagues and fulfill your job well, then you're likely to gain more happiness than those not.

To sum it up, for me, job has greater happiness than social life.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-26 11:40
看完自己写的太恶心，实在是没法原谅自己。怒大换学之。

When compared with job and social life, which are two indispensable ingredients of human beings, many people may prefer social life more because social life can easily be associated with relax, pleasure, new friend, excitement, etc. From my point of view, job, would bring me more happiness than social life.

First and foremost, Job could fulfill us in every aspect of our needs, thus it can bring us much more pleasure than social life. A famous psychologist Abraham Maslow has revealed the motivation of human beings, in his hierarchy of needs theory. He states that people are pursuing essentials to survival, safety, love and belongings, esteem, and self-actualization. Through working in an organization, one can always find his belongings. If the one have solid knowledge and skills in that he can dominate his job, then he could get esteem from others in his field. Finally, through promotion and recognition, one may achieve self-actualization by diligent work.

Moreover, the happiness brought by job tends to be longlasting while that brought by social life usually transient. work time accounts for most of the time of a grownup. Diligent work would always fulfill us by achievement and accomplishment. Take me as an example, last semester I joined a part-time job to be assistant of my professor, working on a project regarding valuation of a firm. I'm totally caught by my job because this field is so attractive and it's such a satisfaction each time I got progression of the project. I don't even want move when I sat down and concentrated on my project, let alone went to social. On this basis, job plays a more important role in satisfying people.

To be objective, I'm not saying that job would gratify us better than social life all the time. In some circumstances, social life may please us in a better way. For example, one has been working hard for the past year thus kind of exhausted and under pressure, going to social would be a good choice for him to relax, instead of working more.

To sum it up, in most cases and in the long run as well, a desirable job would make us happier than social life.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-27 10:21
10月26日综写 TPO12
The professor indicates that Jane Austen is not the subject of that portrait, which contradicts directly to the points the reading material made.

Firstly, professor contends that by the time Austen's offspring gave the permission, Austen has died for 70 years. So those Austen's families never see her themselves, let along recognize her in the portrait.

Secondly, while the passage believes that the face in the portraits resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch, the professor argues that the any female offspring of Austen may resembles that one in her sister's sketch. To be specific, the professor explains that the extend families of Austen are huge and there's a lot of female teenage in them, anyone of them may looks alike Austen.

Third,

rofessor claims that everything other than style does not seem to be Ozias's masterpiece. What's more, there's clearly some stamp in the portrait, which is made by William. However, such stamps did not introduced into England until Austen had been 27 years old. This directly oppose to the point the passage make, which claims Jane Austen was a teenage then.

Due to those points made in lecture, the professor believes Jane Austen is not the subject of the portrait.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-28 04:36
10月26 独立 Nowadays, it is much easier to achieve success with help from one’s family than what is like before.

Admittedly, under the complexity of today's society, too much factors have been associated with success than they did in the past. Amont all this ingredients to one's success, family is the among the most important factors, if not the most.

First and foremost, families offer people especially young people a better platform for education then they did ever before. Parents in today has more conscious in terms of importance of education than they did before. A small example may give some light to this point, when I was a kid, my father told me his experience of losing opportunity to school when he was a kid. So he was really strict on my coursework and pay a lot of attention on building my personalities, such as patience, diligence, and perseverance, etc. As a result, with such thoughtful parenting education, young people in this generation are more likely to succeed than before.

Second, parents in today are more willing to and more capable of giving their descendants' financial support than they did before. It is no doubt that the cost of education in today account for a significant portion of budgets of families. Thanks to the development to society, most of the families however, could afford such cost of education. Their children could concentrate on improving studies and cultivate skills without worrying about burdensome financial pressure. Thus they have a easier access to success than those students in the past, which have about falling into starvation and property.

Third, It is family members that could offer their children a better networking system than they did before, which has been a crucial determinant in today's society. For example, Bo Guagua, who is the son Bo xilia, the governor of Chongqing Province of China, easily got the admission letter from both Oxford University and Harvard University. While his academic performance may not competent for a admission from top university, the networking of his father helped a lot.

Sometimes it may hard for us to notice what changes the family has brought to us. Actually our families been contributing to us since we were born. We have a strong and healthy body because parents learned carefully how to make nuitrient food for us, we can reading at a bright and cozy room, without thinking too much about external pressure because of the sacrifice of our parents.

To sum it up, according to we have argued above, it's may barely arbitrary to conclude that we could easier to get succeed than ever before only if we take good advantage of resources given by our families.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-30 06:49
TPO22综合

The professor listed three reasons that ethanol fuel would be a good alternative for gasoline, which contradicted directly to what the passage suggests.

First, while the passage contends that ethanol does not perform better than gasoline in terms of environmental protection, the professor argues that plants, from which ethanol fuel are made, could counter act the carbon dioxide release by absorbing those carbon dioxide as their nutrients. Thus the amount of carbon dioxide the plants intake would remove the adverse effect of that amount of carbon dioxide released from the usage of ethanol fuel.

Second, the professor continues disputing the passage by claiming that usage of plants to get ethanol would not affect the feed of animals. To be specific, the parts of plants that are used to produce ethanol fuel are those parts inedible to animals. Thus, the availability of source of food for animals would not be influenced at all.

Third, the professor admitted part of the point presented in the passage that it is the tax subsidies that makes the current price of ethanol relatively cheap. Based on the prediction that price would be driven down when there is more demand and thus more production, he believes that the price of ethanol fuel would be as competent as gasoline in the future. He even gave a specific prediction. He said that the price of ethanol fuel would dropped by 40% if production boost three times as current level.

Based on these details and explanations, the professor strongly holds that the ethanol fuel would be a well-suited alternative of gasoline.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-31 10:00
10.31独立 Young people nowadays have no influence on decisions that determine the future of the society as a whole. A\D

Young people nowadays are playing vital role of almost every aspect of society. Some elites among these youngsters have shown their excellence and aspiration in altering the future of the society. But as far as I am concerned, they still not influence the determination of future of the society.

To begin with, though a significant amount of youngsters today are enjoying the best education and have achieved relatively solid knowledge and skills in their field, they still need more experience to be qualified for making decision in terms of the whole society. The example of U.S.education system may give some light to this point. The most distinguished universities always ask for work experience for their applicants especially in some practical fields such as business, public policy. Under this basis, many students have been rejected even though some of them have perfect academic performance. That's illustrate the importance of experience in those pivot fields, which need fresh men take years to fill up.

Youngsters also have some disadvantage in their characteristics when compared with grownups, which would hamper their ability to make right decisions for society. Young people tend to be more emotional, more impatient, and less mature, which make them inappropriate in big decision making. For exmaple, the constitution of China states that citizen have to be at least 55 years old to be eligible for Chairman of the China. Young people just need more time in practice to foster their qualities. A mature man should be responsible, rational, pressure-bearing in his field.

To be objective, some elites among young people have shown their talents and potential in leadership. Some of them have have some influence in their surrounding. May be they're capable of altering the world in the future, however, they still far away from determining the future of the society at this moment.

To sum it up, youngsters today need more time and more practice to be eligible in making decision on behalf of the whole society.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-10-31 10:43
TPO 17

The professor contends that the size of birds population would not be declined as the passage indicates.

First, the passage suggests that increasing human population always come along with more exploitation on wild areas, which threaten the habitats of birds. The professor, on the contrary, argues that only some of the birds may decrease while others may increase, which would counter act the side effect it brings. To be specific, urban areas actually providing a better and larger habitats for some kinds of birds. Some residents even complain about the boost of population of birds such as pigeons and hawks.

Second, the professor believes that the agriculture activities would not increase the way as passage suggests. She states that there have been less and less destruction of bird habitats due to the increasing productivity. She further indicates that a new highly productive crop have been introduced into agriculture activities, which can surge the productivity per land unit. The outcome of products would meet human needs very well.

Third, even though professor admitted that right now pesticides do harm birds from survival, she believes that would not be a problem in the future. To be specfic, new pesticides have rarely been introduced into agriculture use and the overall usage of pesticides is tends to decline. Moreover, the crops we are planting are resistant to the insects, thus there is no need for further pesticide usage. Consequently the size of birds' population can aviod of damaging.

To sum it up, the professor do not think that birds would be harmed as a result of increasing population and agriculture activities.

作者: dreamcece 时间: 2012-11-2 08:17
标题: 10.31 独立改
蓝色为意见或建议高亮为精彩绿色为总结红色为错误

Young people nowadays are playing vital role of in almost every aspect of society. Some elites among these youngsters have shown their excellence and aspiration in altering the future of the society. But as far as I am concerned, they still 谓语呢？not influence the determination of future of the society.

To begin with, though a significant amount of youngsters today are enjoying the best education and have achieved relatively solid knowledge？搭配有问题，achieve knowledge... 没见过。。。Acquire比较好 and skills in their field, they still need more experience to be qualified for making decision in terms of the whole society. The example of U.S.education system may give some light to this point. The most distinguished universities always ask for work experience for their applicants especially in some practical fields such as business, public policy. Under this basis, many students have been rejected even though some of them have perfect academic performance. That's illustrate the importance of experience in those pivot fields, which need fresh men take years to fill up.

Youngsters also have some disadvantage in their characteristics ~~when~~ compared with grownups, which would hamper their ability to make right decisions for society. Young people tend to be more emotional, more impatient, and less mature, which make them inappropriate in big decision making. For exmaple, the constitution of China states that citizen have to be at least 55 years old to be eligible for Chairman of the China. Young people just need more time in practice to foster their qualities. A mature man should be responsible, rational, pressure-bearing in his field.

To be objective, some elites among young people have shown their talents and potential in leadership. Some of them have have some influence in their surrounding. May be they're capable of altering the world in the future, however, they still far away from determining the future of the society at this moment.

To sum it up, youngsters today need more time and more practice to be eligible in making decision on behalf of the whole society.

总结：楼主写的很流利，问题有，介词的搭配不准确；写的句子有些冗长。但是大家好像都有这个问题，我就不吹毛求疵了。
另，祝楼主考试顺利呀。

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-11-2 08:55
谢谢啊，cece，你说的那个谓语就是influence，它有vt的用法。那个achieve knowledge，= =见笑了，好滑稽我还老这么用。谢谢谢谢。问一句，你怎么改的啊？那些颜色以及mark笔的效果都怎么弄上来的？

作者: dreamcece 时间: 2012-11-2 08:59
内个啥，你用word改，然后粘贴帖子的时候有个从word复制的键，然后点那个，直接把你在word里面改的粘过来就好了。

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-11-2 09:54
Do you a/d: taking part-time job is one of the best way to prepare teenagers to be adults.

It may be one of the most common concern of parents: how to get children well-prepared to be adult. There do have a matitude of ways to achieve such goals. For instance, travelling alone, taking part-time job, or even taking a boarding school. As far as I'm concerned, taking a part-time job would especially beneficial for teenagers. Reasons and Explanations are listed as follows.

First and foremost, teenagers could may money via taking a part-time job. Financial independence is the key criteria to be a adult. Once children can sustain yourself without asking for money from your parents, they solve the most basic problem a grownup make face. My story may give some light to the point. When I was 17 years old and just graduated from high school, my mom sent me to restaurant to be a waiter for a month. To be frank, I was suffered at first I had a hard time in getting up early in morning and I felt like that I lose my freedom. But one month later, when I got salary payment for the first time of my life, I was fulfilled by achievement and happiness. I bought a keyboard for me as a prize of hard working and I bought a watch for my mother, she was so happied and spoke highly of me.

Moreover, taking a part-time job is also a good time for teenagers to build inter-personal skills, which account for one of the useful skills for a adult. After entering the society, It is crucial for one to learn to get along well with others, especially colleagues. If a person fail to getting in harmony with surrounding, he probably could not perform his job well and maybe work time could become hard time for him. According to a survey published on "Science", those people who do not have a sound relation with their colleagues tend be looked down upon, which would adversely affect their working efficiency. Some of those, however, be fired by the boss finally.

Last but not the least, It is also a good experience for children to take a part-time job because they can learn their elementary lesson about sacrifice and dedication. Hardly would those teenagers know that earning money is not as easy as spending money. Through working, teenagers may get a big idea about what is sacrifice and dedication is, then they may be start to appreciate what their parents gave them. They may start to realize the life in the future would not as easily as the life they're enjoying today. For my own experience, I started to understand my parents, for what they sacrificed and dedicated to. I started to be thankful.

All in all, taking a part-time job could greatly beneficial to teenagers and give them a big idea how a real grownup should be.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-11-2 10:25
修改后。
It may be one of the most common concern of parents: how to get children well-prepared to be adults. There do have a multitude of ways to achieve such goal. For instance, travelling alone, taking part-time job, or even taking a boarding school. As far as I'm concerned, taking a part-time job would especially beneficial for teenagers. Reasons and Explanations are listed as follows.

First and foremost, teenagers could make money via taking a part-time job. Financial independence is a key criteria to be a adult. Once children can sustain themselves without asking for money from their parents, they will solve the most basic problem a grownup would face. My story may give some light to the point. When I was 17 years old and just graduated from high school, my mom sent me to restaurant to be a waiter for a month. To be frank, I was suffered at first that I had a hard time in getting up early in morning and I felt like that I lose my freedom. But one month later, when I got salary payment for the first time of my life, I was fulfilled by achievement and happiness. I bought a keyboard for me as a prize of hard working and I bought a watch for my mother, she was so happy and spoke highly of me. In this sense, financial independence is important for a teenager to be an adult

Moreover, taking a part-time job is also a good time for teenagers to build inter-personal skills, which account for one of the most useful skills for a adult. After entering the society, It is crucial for one to learn to get along well with others, especially colleagues. If a person fail to getting in harmony with surroundings, he probably could not perform his job well. Much less, work time could become hard time for him. According to a survey published on "Science", those people who do not have a sound relation with their colleagues tend be looked down upon by his workmates, which would adversely affect their working efficiency. Some of those, however, be fired by the boss finally. Thus I believe taking part-time job would do good to teenagers by giving them a platform to learn inter-personal skills.

Last but not the least, It is can be educational for children to take a part-time job because they can learn their elementary lesson about sacrifice and dedication. Hardly would those teenagers know that earning money is not as easily as spending money. Through working, teenagers may get a big idea about what the sacrifice and dedication is, then they may be start to appreciate what their parents gave them. They may start to realize the life in the future would not as easily as the life they're enjoying today. For my own experience, I started to understand my parents, for what they sacrificed and dedicated to. I started to be thankful. Thanks to my part-time work experience.

All in all, taking a part-time job could greatly beneficial to teenagers and give them a big idea how a real grownup should be.

作者: NmgMadman 时间: 2012-11-3 04:41
In contemporary society, one of the most common dilemma may be the dilemma between "accuracy" and "quickness". Some people may think quickness is outweigh the accuracy because they believe quickness stands for efficiency. However, in my view, accuracy is always my priority when I am carrying out a work.

First and foremost, sometimes mistakes are not allowed because that may result in disaster, especially in technological industry such as manufacture of aircrafts, rockets. The cost of mistakes even small mistakes may be significant. One may lose his property, job. In some circumstances, the result may even severe, even causing death. For instance, in Zhejiang Province of 2011, a train run out of the track, more than 100 people died in the accident. The reason is that some officials in the government tried to push forward the process of construction of modern super trains, which has a higher speed than the regular ones. However, they fail to guarantee the quality of the project at the same time. Emphasizing speed result in death, what a tragedy. I don't think such tradeoff is deserve. In this sense, I believe we should always put the accuracy on the first place, otherwise there would be more tragedies tomorrow.

Moreover, sometimes working quickly are actually would slow the process as a whole. If there are a multitude of mistakes are made during the work process, then one must probably retackle the problem again, which in turn would adversely affect the efficiency. This example may give some light to the point. When I was at college, I worked as a TA for my economics professor. Once when I was scoring the assignments the students handed in, I was so rush because I was eager to go to an appointment. Later on, a lot of students complained about the mistakes I made during the process. My professor heard about that and blamed on me. I was asked to rescore the whole stack of assignments! In this basis, It is not a good deal to trade accuracy with speed, in which case we may lose more. On the other hand, if you work carefully, you may accelerate your job.

To be objective, It is may helpful to work quickly than to work mistakes. For example, if the deadline is around the corner, if it is ok to make some mistakes in some tasks.

Generally speaking, I prefer perform my job my accurately than quickly. Don't too rush, there's stones on the road. The faster, the more possibility that you may be hindered.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)