ChaseDream

标题: gwd-7-32的求助 [打印本页]
作者: tweib    时间: 2004-11-6 22:29
标题: gwd-7-32的求助

Q32:


A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.




  • claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

  • claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought

  • claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts

  • claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts

  • claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts

    •    Answer:  a


    Gwd5-Q14:


    Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.




  • as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as

  • as had been in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what

  • than there was in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as that which

  • than in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as

  • than in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what

    •    answer：e


    第一题是be as weak as some analysts previously thought


    第二题是were not as low as what an industry trade group had previously estimated


    只讨论以上，as adj as 后面为什么　有两种不同用法？

    作者: jnlvo    时间: 2004-11-7 12:03

    第二题选e，可能是主要觉得other不应少，要把自身July排除（具体可在参见置顶帖中的相关帖子，好像当时还有些争议）。个人认为如果是than in any other month since October , sales of fund shares in July were not as low as, 少what会更好些。


    考试时就遇到这么类似一题对what多和少进行区别的，当时选的是有what的，感觉是错了。对此考点现在还不是很清楚，希望有NN看到此帖能来指点一二。


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-7 12:05:33编辑过]
    作者: LES    时间: 2004-11-7 17:00

    目前为止，偶的认识还是：what在第一题中是被省略了；而在第二题中保留了。

    作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-11-7 21:48

    Just for your reference.

    Actually, it is better to dispense with "what" in this structure. But I don't think it is wrong when "what" is not omited.

    Therefore, due to the fact that the "other" is indispensible, choice E of Gwd5-Q14 should be correct.

    More often than not, "what" seems more acceptable than when it is omitted to a tyro of GMAT. I guess  that in some other subjects ETS is likely to insert a mistake in the choice with "what" whereas the choice without "what" is the correct one. But this is not the case for Gwd5-Q14 . So probably the D without "what" is a trap for a veteran of GMAT .

    作者: rhod    时间: 2004-11-8 12:18

    呵呵，NN们都发表过意见了，偶就搬个凳子捧捧场吧.

    作者: jnlvo    时间: 2004-11-8 13:37

    谢谢大家了！！！

    作者: hades    时间: 2005-4-4 14:31

    我支持LES，按照LZM和BY的说法，what应该是有的，但遇到什么thought呀，estimated就可以省去作为习惯用法而不用考虑时态。个人意见：）

    对了，还想问一下，as....as的结构如果是否定句，是不是可以not...so....as？在否定句中，so....as和as....as有没有哪个更优先？

    作者: bigmouse    时间: 2005-4-10 18:34
    GWD－7－Q32有没有更好、更详细的解释？C为什么不对啊？
    作者: autumn_leaves    时间: 2005-4-10 20:00
    C单从语法结构上来说没有错,但不好的地方是用了被动语态
    作者: ah_eric    时间: 2005-5-3 17:34
    c中应该是has been 吧
    作者: Avantasia    时间: 2005-5-9 18:16

    强烈支持C!

    是否是用被动语态不是考点, 而且这里即使用了被动语态, 施动者还是清晰的, 所以应该不是问题.

    而且很关键的是C中as...as这个结构后面省略了相同的主语economy, 使得对比很明确. 对比Gwd5-Q14(这个答案应该是更确定的), 我们可以发现这个对比的主语是不可以省略的.

    至于hades说的LZM上的省略, 我没有看过LZM, 不敢乱说, 希望大家可以查一查, 看看是否可以省略.

    作者: 新手上路3    时间: 2005-5-9 18:26

            C的时态肯定错，这里只能用过去时态

            另外前面大家说了，省略的是what，而不是economy

    作者: Avantasia    时间: 2005-5-9 19:08

    但是what=the thing that, 那这个thing又是什么? 应该就是Economy没错吧.

    楼上怎么那么肯定C的时态就错了? 请教.

    作者: 新手上路3    时间: 2005-5-9 22:22

             完成时表示动作thought在过去发生并持续时间（到现在）

             不能说那些专家一直持续的想经济不好，过去时态表明他们过去认为经济不好，合情合理

             the thing 指the economy might be weak

    作者: Avantasia    时间: 2005-5-9 22:31
    我觉得这题没有考时态, 经济学家怎么预测, 是他们的事情, 也许过去的事实就是让他们一直认为经济状况不好, 这也没有什么不合情理的, 所以感觉不能那时态当作放弃C的原因.
    作者: luciali    时间: 2005-5-17 14:28

    C.the economy might not be as weak as have been

    C最根本的错误应该是have been吧？economy是单数，这里应该用has been吧？

    作者: jessicapink    时间: 2005-6-13 11:47
    luciali说的有道理。
    作者: fr6102790    时间: 2005-9-16 22:35

    对了，还想问一下，as....as的结构如果是否定句，是不是可以not...so....as？在否定句中，so....as和as....as有没有哪个更优先？




    俺就是因为顾及这一点才选了B,求求给个说法吧?



    已经不问语法好多年,都没第六感觉了

    作者: fr6102790    时间: 2005-9-17 20:31

    求助众兄弟姐妹.........

    作者: fr6102790    时间: 2005-9-19 22:42
    help?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    作者: fr6102790    时间: 2005-9-21 15:42
    求助,就快考了...............................
    作者: dreamerps    时间: 2005-10-6 15:31
    以下是引用luciali在2005-5-17 14:28:00的发言：

    C.the economy might not be as weak as have been


    C最根本的错误应该是have been吧？economy是单数，这里应该用has been吧？



    同意！而且as…thought/expected/estimated等表示如某某所想 是固定用法，OG上出现了无数次
    作者: amacd    时间: 2005-10-12 20:59
    以下是引用hades在2005-4-4 14:31:00的发言：

    对了，还想问一下，as....as的结构如果是否定句，是不是可以not...so....as？在否定句中，so....as和as....as有没有哪个更优先？


    A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.




  • claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

  • claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought

  • claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts

  • claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts

  • claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts

    • ding, i have the same question too~

    作者: wzhyan    时间: 2005-11-17 08:29

    同意LUciali的说法


    c 是由于have been 的原因才不如A


    作者: homegirl    时间: 2005-12-19 09:14

    C should be "has been"


    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-19 10:11:57编辑过]
    作者: ilovecushi    时间: 2007-10-6 14:21

    agree with floor 9.

    active tense is always better than passive tense, so if you are confusing between a and c, you can use this rule to choose.

    open to discuss

    作者: happycg    时间: 2008-6-1 11:15
    dddddddddddddddddddddd



    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3