感谢DUKB24,prep和og是最好的我也明白,但是这是楼主三战了,这两份资料的答案实在太清晰了,og又刷了一遍,所以想用新题检验一下效果如何。
莫非把prep08再刷一遍么?
另:我发现这么多题的确很蛋疼= = 我看解释都有点晕乎。。。。
-- by 会员 17tomato (2012/10/16 21:32:17)
1. I’m not quite sure whether
where and
in which are interchangeable here... It is not a good split to me
B. there is no ambiguity in
having (it modifies the preceding clause);the usage of having here does not make sense..we need a
noun modifier
other analysis seems fine to me
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/16 18:22:53)
1. I’m not quite sure whether
where and
in which are interchangeable here... It is not a good split to me
B. there is no ambiguity in
having (it modifies the preceding clause);the usage of having here does not make sense..we need a
noun modifier
other analysis seems fine to me
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/16 18:22:53)
关于having,你的意思是不是:既然都是修饰Esaugetu Emissee这个人 ,没有必要一个用who引导的定从来修饰,一个又用ving来修饰?
另外,在表示动作的时候,have the power to do是不是应该比have the power of doing 要好?
-- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/10/31 23:09:02)