Bank depositors in the
131. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?
(A) Before the government started to insure depositors against bank failure, there was a lower rate of bank failure than there is now.
(B) When the government did not insure deposits, frequent bank failures occurred as a result of depositors' fears of losing money in bank failures.
(C) Surveys show that a significant proportion of depositors are aware that their deposits are insured by the government.
(D) There is an upper limit on the amount of an individual's deposit that the government will insure, but very few individuals' deposits exceed thislimit.
(E) The security of a bank against failure depends on the percentage of its assets that are loaned out and also on how much risk its loans involve.
key is B. What's wrong with E? E 直接说明还有别的原因决定bank failure,weaken了economist 的government insurance is responsible for bank failure.
tks.
原文结论并没说政府保险是唯一原因,而只是说partly responsible
原文结论并没说政府保险是唯一原因,而只是说partly responsible
thanks, lawyer
NN:
How do you understand "depend on"? I think A depend on B means B is the main reason of causing A, so I think the answer "e" is right? Another question is that accoring to XDF's class ,A depend on B mans B is necessary to A ,a->b, but I donot think so. For example, whether I go there depends on whether you go there.
you go->I go, you do not go->I will not go, so I think depend onA depend on B is A<->B
thanks!
这里有个关键词depositors were more selective
是否是depositors 有能力做这件事呢,B 正是说明了depositors 根本没有能力去做这件事,因为所有的BANK 都不行,他都没的选
我有问题:如果没有B选项的话,是否能选A选项,我认为A选项一定程度上说明政府的行为和银行的failure有关。
请问我这个想法对不对?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |