ChaseDream

标题: OG13 SC 15 对面的NN看过来看过来 [打印本页]

作者: 小布牙    时间: 2012-10-11 15:53
标题: OG13 SC 15 对面的NN看过来看过来
15.Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in March not as a sign that households were pressed for cash and forced to borrow, rather a sign of confidence bv households that thev could safely handle new debt.
(A) rather a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
(B) yet as a sign of households' confidence that it was safe for them to
(C) but a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
(D) but as a sign that households were confident they could safely
(E) but also as a sign that households were confident in their ability safely to


我的问题就两个:
 1. OG 对此题的by 做的是如下解释:  The preposition by does not express the idea that  households are confident
       为什么呢?by 怎么就没有表明households confidennt 了呢
2.OG 对A选项的解释还有:
The placeement of the restrictive clause that they could safelyhandle new debt after households could also cause confusion
      为什么呢?哪里confusion了?

作者: DUKB24    时间: 2012-10-11 16:08
15.Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in March not as a sign that households were pressed for cash and forced to borrow, rather a sign of confidence bv households that thev could safely handle new debt.
(A) rather a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
(B) yet as a sign of households' confidence that it was safe for them to
(C) but a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
(D) but as a sign that households were confident they could safely
(E) but also as a sign that households were confident in their ability safely to


我的问题就两个:
 1. OG 对此题的by 做的是如下解释:  The preposition by does not express the idea that  households are confident
       为什么呢?by 怎么就没有表明households confidennt 了呢
2.OG 对A选项的解释还有:
The placeement of the restrictive clause that they could safelyhandle new debt after households could also cause confusion
      为什么呢?哪里confusion了?
-- by 会员 小布牙 (2012/10/11 15:53:45)





that is meant to modify confidence and should be placed close to the noun;but the place of that seems to modify households


a sign of vs. a sign that  ( this split has already been explicitly stated by manhattan SC;you should think it over)
作者: 小布牙    时间: 2012-10-11 16:47
15.Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in March not as a sign that households were pressed for cash and forced to borrow, rather a sign of confidence bv households that thev could safely handle new debt.
(A) rather a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
(B) yet as a sign of households' confidence that it was safe for them to
(C) but a sign of confidence by households that they could safely
(D) but as a sign that households were confident they could safely
(E) but also as a sign that households were confident in their ability safely to


我的问题就两个:
 1. OG 对此题的by 做的是如下解释:  The preposition by does not express the idea that  households are confident
       为什么呢?by 怎么就没有表明households confidennt 了呢
2.OG 对A选项的解释还有:
The placeement of the restrictive clause that they could safelyhandle new debt after households could also cause confusion
      为什么呢?哪里confusion了?
-- by 会员 小布牙 (2012/10/11 15:53:45)






that is meant to modify confidence and should be placed close to the noun;but the place of that seems to modify households


a sign of vs. a sign that  ( this split has already been explicitly stated by manhattan SC;you should think it over)
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/11 16:08:09)






再次感谢DUKB前辈!
很喜欢你的签名
作者: 小布牙    时间: 2012-10-11 17:06
对了前辈,是不是that修饰的都是里它最近的名词呢?
我刚才看到OG13 SC 10题对C选项的解释:
The widely accepted big bang theory holds that the universe began in an explosive instant ten to twenty billion  years ago and has been expanding ever since.

(A) that the universe began in an explosive instant ten to twenty billion years ago and has been expanding


(C) that the beginning of the universe was an explosive instant ten to twenty billion years ago that has expanded

OG:The relative clause that has expanded describes instant, which makes no sense.

是不是就是你所说的 that is meant to modify confidence and should be placed close to the noun?

作者: icewaterkira    时间: 2012-12-17 15:30
最近看了很多关于that 和which 的跳跃指代问题。that 和which一般是修饰最近的名词,但是有例外,会跳跃指代,修饰前面的某个名词,具体情况具体分析。有个帖子的。你可以搜一下。
作者: zzwho    时间: 2013-8-17 15:34
追问一个问题,如果将E选项中的but also改成rather than,是不是也可以成为正确答案?求回复...
作者: zzwho    时间: 2013-8-17 15:51
zzwho 发表于 2013-8-17 15:34
追问一个问题,如果将E选项中的but also改成rather than,是不是也可以成为正确答案?求回复... ...

好吧,我自己搜了下,这个讨论帖很有用http://www.beatthegmat.com/help-pls-not-but-rather-than-instead-of-t27020.html。。。。当然,中国大牛看到这个帖子也说下自己的看法啦~~
作者: love凤巢    时间: 2013-9-8 15:40
DUKB24 发表于 2012-10-11 16:08
15.Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in March not as a sign that  ...

DUKB前辈,“confidence by households that “在这种一个名词后面各一个介词短语的情况中,that 不应该是修饰confidence的吗?而不是修饰household. 而且,households 是人,不能用that来修饰,只能用who来修饰所以我觉得这里的that 修饰应该没有歧义的吧?
作者: DUKB24    时间: 2013-9-8 23:15
love凤巢 发表于 2013-9-8 15:40
DUKB前辈,“confidence by households that “在这种一个名词后面各一个介词短语的情况中,that 不应该 ...

但是你这样的话,原本的核心结构应该是句子,这里变成了名词,不仅不平行,而且也显得很突兀
作者: love凤巢    时间: 2013-9-9 23:23
DUKB24 发表于 2013-9-8 23:15
但是你这样的话,原本的核心结构应该是句子,这里变成了名词,不仅不平行,而且也显得很突兀 ...

前辈说的有道理,我也发现了OG中经常会出现这种一个名词,正确答案后面用一个同位语从句来解释这个名词的含义,而不是介词短语限定这个名词的情况。不过我仔细读了一下这个句子,发现对于OG解释的onfusion有和前辈不一样的理解。我觉得that从句从句意上是应该修饰confidence的,但是 a sign of confidence by househods that, 我觉得语法上又是修饰sign的(曼哈顿中好像没提到这种一个名词后连续跟两个介词短语环环限定的情况,所以这只是我个人的推测),所以有点confusion了。求前辈指教。
作者: DUKB24    时间: 2013-9-9 23:34
love凤巢 发表于 2013-9-9 23:23
前辈说的有道理,我也发现了OG中经常会出现这种一个名词,正确答案后面用一个同位语从句来解释这个名词的 ...

如果你说的是a sign of confidence by households that,那么that这个句子着重就是要解释confidence或者household,这是不是原意呢?假设不是原意,或者阻止你去清晰的理解句意,这就是confusion,不一定要从某个单词或者语法来理解,可以从整个意思来理解。

a sign that就是说这个sign是关于什么的,而不是像上面的a sign of confidence(这个sign就是关于confidence,其余信息我们都不知道,因为that不是修饰sign的)

open to discussion
作者: abc791201064    时间: 2013-9-14 17:50
有道理!!!
作者: abc791201064    时间: 2013-9-14 17:56
DUKB24 发表于 2012-10-11 16:08
15.Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in March not as a sign that  ...

这里that修饰confidence是从意思上判断的 语义上 但是they指代的是households啊
作者: kathryncjq    时间: 2013-9-22 09:51
The placement of the restrictive clause that they could safely handle new debt after households could also cause confusion.         
有两个问题:
1.restrictive clause中,that作为关系代词修饰前面的名词,但是会在后面的句子中做成分,但是此句中that在“that they could safely handle new debt”中做什么成分?
2."cause confusion"  WHY?

作者: YvaineDing    时间: 2013-10-4 10:08
在选项A中,that they could safely handle new debt 是修饰 households的,可是句子的原意修饰的是a sign,所以这里that后面的从句必须紧跟a sign,我不懂的是为什么confidence by households 就不能表示households are confident呢?如果说前者是指households‘ confidence,而后者是指households are confident,一个是名词性短语,另一个是一个句子,而且表达意思上也有差异。可以这么理解么??
作者: Serena0304    时间: 2014-8-4 21:06
DUKB24 发表于 2012-10-11 16:08
15.Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in March not as a sign that  ...

前辈,问一下B中的yet对么?谢谢!
作者: 小陈冲鸭    时间: 2018-8-19 09:27
love凤巢 发表于 2013-9-9 23:23
前辈说的有道理,我也发现了OG中经常会出现这种一个名词,正确答案后面用一个同位语从句来解释这个名词的 ...

我觉得说的挺对…




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3