标题: 请教一道语法题 [打印本页] 作者: chenbingyz 时间: 2012-9-3 19:22 标题: 请教一道语法题 Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
B.Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber C.Dickinson , written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering D.Dickinson , which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering(E) E.Dickinson , which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber 请教：该题的答案是E，但是outnumber不要用过去式么？ 作者: abjure 时间: 2012-9-3 22:06
不需要啊，没有time frame 表示要使用 ｐａｓｔ ｔｅｎｓｅ 假如没有特别ｔｉｍｅ ｆｒａｍｅ你不可以ｓｈｉｆｔ时态的。
句子主干就是一个简单的比较
Emily Dickinson’s letters 。。。。 outnumber her letters to anyone else. 在这个层面没有过去时的ｔｉｍｅ ｆｒａｍｅ作者: chenbingyz 时间: 2012-9-4 05:27
非常感谢！ 但是再次请教： “were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886” 这些都不能算time frame么？ 谢谢！ 作者: DUKB24 时间: 2012-9-4 09:00
非常感谢！ 但是再次请教： “were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886” 这些都不能算time frame么？ 谢谢！
既然没有这个时态的选项，你大可不必纠结，时态也是change the meaning的一个常考点作者: abjure 时间: 2012-9-4 10:44
非常感谢！ 但是再次请教： “were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886” 这些都不能算time frame么？ 谢谢！
-- by 会员 chenbingyz (2012/9/4 5:27:24)
“in 1886”是一个time frame 但是在你决定它是谁的修饰语之前，你要看清楚它的位置。 OG 里面对于时间词的位置放置是有讲究的，因为它会影响到它修饰的对象是谁，语义什么。一般来说它要紧靠时间词的修饰对象来确保其语义清晰， 这里"In 1886"位置在修饰语内 ”ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886“ 用来就近修饰 emily's death 的时间短语的。 即：这题中你不可以把“in 1886”理解为它是outnumber的修饰语（语义语法都不行）。这也是我最初帖子说的，在主干这个层次（out number）不需要过去时的原因
非常感谢！ 但是再次请教： “were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886” 这些都不能算time frame么？ 谢谢！
-- by 会员 chenbingyz (2012/9/4 5:27:24)
“in 1886”是一个time frame 但是在你决定它是谁的修饰语之前，你要看清楚它的位置。 OG 里面对于时间词的位置放置是有讲究的，因为它会影响到它修饰的对象是谁，语义什么。一般来说它要紧靠时间词的修饰对象来确保其语义清晰，尤其做noun modifer的时候 这里"In 1886"位置在修饰语内 ”ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886“ 用来就近修饰 emily's death 的时间短语的。 即：这题中你不可以把“in 1886”理解为它是outnumber的修饰语（语义语法都不行）。这也是我最初帖子说的，在主干这个层次（out number）不需要过去时的原因
