ChaseDream

标题: GWD1-Q7求解答~ [打印本页]

作者: qwl5004    时间: 2012-9-1 11:01
标题: GWD1-Q7求解答~
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A.    that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
B.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
D.    CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
E.    CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

答案是C

三个问题求NN解答。

1. A是不是错在没有do。应该是that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers do。还有compared to a ratio of 42 times是否有错?

2. C里面的their指代我认为不清啊。可以指代CEO's也可以指代blue-collar workers。

3. CEO's 为什么不用CEOs来表示复数? 是不是因为CEO是简写Chief Executive Officers? 谢谢!
作者: jiaoguitar    时间: 2012-9-1 11:40
A错在逻辑对象比较不对等。CEO's now earn 与 ratio对比,错。
B,道理同A,同时compare要用被动形式。
C,CEO是的单数,workers是复数,所以their只能指代workers,没有歧义。
作者: naryi    时间: 2012-9-3 00:05
compared to a ratio of 42 times当然有错,应比较同类事物。这道题比的是挣的钱倍数的不同 而且C的effectiveness也更好
作者: zzx576122628    时间: 2014-8-15 11:59
B.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C.    that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

BC一个明显区别是对比对象不一致
CEO's=CEOs 不然整道题都不对了
compare不能用主动





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3