标题: 求助一道逻辑题 [打印本页] 作者: rchgogogo 时间: 2012-8-18 09:50 标题: 求助一道逻辑题 36。Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened. B. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores. C. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had. D. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades. E. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.
答案： A. 探讨顾客的行为，无关； B. C开张后再开的都是折扣店，即折扣店和非折扣店都竞争不过，正确； C. 探讨现在的情况，无关； D. 探讨G地区的人口增速，无关； E. 探讨这一地区商店所售商品，无关作者: MichelleLXN 时间: 2012-9-15 15:13
想请教一下，我的理解能力不是很好，读完题后感觉根本读不出两个例子之间是由一个推出另一个的关系啊。光读题的话，第二句直接说In the five years…与第一句之间也没什么衔接，怎么能看出作者是在暗示由后面推出前面，即:由Colson非折扣店挤垮其他店后新开了一家店,推出Goreville折扣店挤垮其他店后也会有新店开张呢？读完题看不出这层推理关系就更别说削弱推理关系了是不是我自己水平太弱了。。。
是不是我自己水平太弱了。。。