标题: 丁丁倒数 52#（what is the LSAT consistent?） [打印本页] 作者: 玛莎丁丁 时间: 2012-8-17 00:33 标题: 丁丁倒数 52#（what is the LSAT consistent?） Columnist: A recent study suggests that living with a parrot increases one's risk of lung cancer.But no one thinks the governement should impose financial impediments on the owning of parrots because of this apparent danger.So by the same token, the government should not levy analogous special taxes on hunting gear, snow skis, recreational parachutes, or motorcycles.
Each of the following principles is logically consistent with the columnist's conclusion EXCEPT:
(A) The government should fund education by taxing non essential sports equipment and recreational gear. (B)The government should not tax those who avoid dangerous activities and adopt heathly lifestyles. (C)The government should create financial disincentives to deter participation in activities it deems dangerous. (D)The government should not create financial disincentives for people to race cars or climb mountain, even though these are dangerous activities (E)The government would be justified in levying taxes to provide food and shelter for those who cannt afford to pay for them.
Seems a very wierd question to me. OA is C. is it that in LSAT's eye, "irrelevant" could be categorized into "consistent"?作者: lihaolan 时间: 2012-8-17 17:07
A，E is irrelevant 。however，C is opposit with the article。。作者: lihaolan 时间: 2012-8-17 17:10
楼主有什么阅读的好技巧。我做了差不多一本的preptest的阅读。还是没有提高。就是按照老师说的按结构去读。在35分钟只能做3篇错一半。。。