Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it [D]B
我认为本题答案应该是D
语法书上说，but和also可以分割，也有例子。
《新编英语语法》薄冰P633：Not only does he compose music, but he also play./ Not only does he have to type out the answer on a computer, but he also gets the computer to translate it into sounds.
《新编英语语法》章振邦1005：She was not only compelled to stay at home, but she was also forbidden to see her friends
159. In 1978 a national study found that not only had many contractors licensed by a self-policing private guild failed to pass qualifying exams, but they had also falsified their references
同意选D 请问如果在not only...but also倒装中
即
not only. do Subject verb, but also 后面要不要再加主语
因为从上面的例子上看 可以加主语 表示的是两个句子的并列
如果不加主语表示的是两个谓语动词的并列
加不加主语是不是都可以 但到目前为止 见到的倒装句中都是but also 后是要加主语的
谢谢
1. 答案的确应该是D. 同意paopao的理解.
2. 本题的是but的转折含义，不是not only , but also的并列含义.
3. 关于not only, but also的倒装句, 英语语法大全上的例句是:
Not only did they break into his office and steal his books, but they also tore up his manucripts.but可以省略:
Not only did he protest, he also refused to pay his taxes.
4. 如果not only产生倒装, 那么意味着平行的对象是句子, 所以后面的主语自然不能省略.
同意选D 请问如果在not only...but also倒装中
即
not only. do Subject verb, but also 后面要不要再加主语
因为从上面的例子上看 可以加主语 表示的是两个句子的并列
如果不加主语表示的是两个谓语动词的并列
加不加主语是不是都可以 但到目前为止 见到的倒装句中都是but also 后是要加主语的
谢谢
not only.... but also...是主从句，虽然表示并列递进的关系。
not only引导的部分是主句，从句是but also后面的句子。所以not only位于句首可以倒装，but also后面不能倒装，因为从句必须是正常语序。
任何句子必须有主语谓语，包括从句。在所有的引导从句的关系代词/副词中只有that/which/what 可以代替从句的主语或宾语。其他连接词都不可以。所以除了上面提到的三种连接词外，其他连接词引导的从句必须有主语。but also在从句中不作任何成分，所以后面句子必须是完整的，即有完整的主语和谓语。
另外 not only 后面可以只有but或只有also甚至什么都没有。
感谢rhod/stellate
这样清晰明了的解释 我明白了倒装句中but also 是句子 所以主语不能省
另外 是不是在not only...but also
只能用but also/ but 不能单独用also啊
谢谢
好像是，没看到过先例.
辛苦MM 能否麻烦找个ETS例子 感觉见到的大全中的 not only ...but also/ but
另外 在不表示并列时 not just...but also 这里的but also 又作如何理解呢
谢谢
1. 答案的确应该是D. 同意paopao的理解.
2. 本题的是but的转折含义，不是not only , but also的并列含义.
3. 关于not only, but also的倒装句, 英语语法大全上的例句是:
Not only did they break into his office and steal his books, but they also tore up his manucripts.but可以省略:
Not only did he protest, he also refused to pay his taxes.
4. 如果not only产生倒装, 那么意味着平行的对象是句子, 所以后面的主语自然不能省略.
我也觉得这是一个表示转折的句子，跟not only....but also没什么关系。
请问rhod这么肯定答案是d有什么别的根据吗？
then, what's wrong with answer B?
B最大的错误在于那个which gave....没有合适的修饰对象
farmland也照样可以 gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture呀？
觉得D太罗嗦了
1.原句中,gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture是系统性的clearing森林发出的,而不是farmland;
2.哪怕没有原句作为参考,我们也可以知道农田只能产庄稼,怎么可以提供家具和房屋呢?当然是毁林砍树提供的这些东西.
not only did sth do(did??)...but also did it..是对的吧？
not only did sth do...it but also错的吧？？
请教
正巧我也总结了这道题，在http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=55382&id=55382&page=1&skin=0&Star=9的81楼，诚请女公子多提意见！
在刚看到这题的时候，我的版本的GWD有一条注释： Note: Guan, Weidong told me that ETS made the question wrong. The answer should be
"A" on the condition of "it but also". 不理解管老师为什么会这样说？？
I think it should be A.
In my version of GWD, there is a sentence below the question
Note: Guan, Weidong told me that ETS made the question wrong. The answer should be
“A” on the condition of “it but also”
Meanwhile, XDJM have shown the examples which indicate that we can use "but it also"
At last, according to the other choice, I think that the meaning of the sentence is that the cleaning of forests have two consequences:
"created farmland "and "gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture"
we can use the left land as farmland and use the woods to make houses and furniture
单从逻辑角度考虑，个人认为D是最合适的，一方面前后两个分句是转折关系（前面说优点，后面说缺点），另一方面systematic clearing of forests提供houses and furnitures更为合理。
我认为but also一定要跟not only连用把，至少在目前做的ets的题目里面没有先例。感觉这道题没有正确答案，不过矬子里面拔将军，好像还是d好一点
1. 答案的确应该是D. 同意paopao的理解.
2. 本题的是but的转折含义，不是not only , but also的并列含义.
3. 关于not only, but also的倒装句, 英语语法大全上的例句是:
Not only did they break into his office and steal his books, but they also tore up his manucripts.but可以省略:
Not only did he protest, he also refused to pay his taxes.
4. 如果not only产生倒装, 那么意味着平行的对象是句子, 所以后面的主语自然不能省略.
这题还有一个讨论贴我都看过了，觉得e也没什么问题啊
首先not only……but also和not only ……but都是正确的表达方法；其次，e中giving做主句的结果说The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast)这件事情提供了房子和家具也挺合理的；
至于那个it, 虽然有点多余，可也没有什么说不通的地方吧〉？
前面大家说的a, gave时态有问题，b的which指代不清，即使是指farmland，也不能说是farmland提供房子和家具吧？意思上说不过去，应该是clearing这讲事提供了房子和家具；c明显不对的，错的地方太多，没有什么争议；d其实也不觉得有什么错误，也是it有点多余，but it also的用法看过大家的讨论应该是没什么问题的
所以请大家再看看e行不行，因为无论语法和逻辑句意等各方面e都没什么明显错误吧？nn们指教！
我觉得比来比去还是a像点，gwd怎么那么多争议题啊。
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
这个题目要理解句意。 not only... but also... 是递进关系。 而该题中， 两个分句应该是转折关系。 为什么不是递进关系呢。 第一句说create farmland and gave ..., 这个是clearing of forests 的作用。 第二句说什么， caused erosion and deforested ... 这个是副作用， ETS都是环保主义者。 因此是转折关系。
不能单看语法， 要看是否符合逻辑。 因此用not only, but also 的选项都不对。
而D选项中的 but it also 仅仅是表示转折关系， 是正确的。
4. 如果not only产生倒装, 那么意味着平行的对象是句子, 所以后面的主语自然不能省略.
这是规定吗？
A选项not only, but also的确没有用错，但gave错了，应该是give才对
B选项but also错了，应该是but it also
我觉得D选项没什么不对啊，这里but also只是表示转折没有用到not only结构，且逻辑关系准确是clearing of forests give consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture,而不是farmland.
可是只有but also,前面没有not only，这样也对么.OG里面找不到有这样只有单独的but also的例子。当然这样也不能完全排除它是错的可能。
稳妥地方法，我觉得还是先考虑not only...but also的选项为主。
所以偏向于A
大家为什么总觉得but it also一定就是not only..but also呢？
为什么不从意思上考虑，单纯找句型呢？
晕.我觉得应该是B啊.
A.错在 1.create如果和gave并列，应该时态一致，gave为give 2.inexpensive houses之类的应该和farmland更加紧密,应该用作这个的从句修饰之,对森林的系统清理创建了农田,而田地给予了消费者相对廉价的房屋和设备(感觉房子和土地是联系紧密的,至少)
B.以which来修饰farmland,然后保持了时态的正确,not only倒装,which从句里面是gave,然后后面but also也与前面保持完整,不仅而且应该也可以表达意思相对的平行结构吧?
D.两点可疑,1. the systematic clearing 后的create farmland与give consumers不存在并列关系, 后者是对前者的解释和补充;but it also，这个it我们意思理解是指的the systematic clearing，但是形式是否可能引起模糊，认为指的是前面最接近的单数名词 furniture？
欢迎抛砖。看了点prep，感觉ets对代词的使用非常苛刻，不允许有任何不清晰和误解。。。
B最大的错误在于那个which gave....没有合适的修饰对象
SUPPORT d
这道题两份答案给的是A & B,
仔细研究原来D最好。
正巧我也总结了这道题，在http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=55382&id=55382&page=1&skin=0&Star=9的81楼，诚请女公子多提意见！
这个总结太棒了，别让它雪藏啦，忍不住顶一下！
support A
不觉得gave的时态错啊，not only did。。。表示的是要用过去时，gave错在哪了？
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |