ChaseDream

标题: GWD24-38 [打印本页]

作者: byebyelove    时间: 2004-10-21 16:22
标题: GWD24-38

24-38 In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.


A) leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of


B) with its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted


C) and its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting


D) while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of


E) so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting



KEY:


I don't what does " its cargo of its cargo of "


is something wrong?


作者: stellate    时间: 2004-10-21 16:32
应该是写错了
作者: gg666    时间: 2004-10-21 16:44

答案


作者: linxi8389    时间: 2004-10-21 17:51
c 吧, 对不对, 麻烦楼主发条短消息给我, 再讨论
作者: byebyelove    时间: 2004-10-21 17:58
KEY:C
作者: linxi8389    时间: 2004-10-21 18:10
着眼点不是its cargo of its cargo , 而是后面只能用polluting表示行为结果
作者: agk99    时间: 2004-10-21 19:32
有了pollute就不必 cause了嗎?疑惑中
作者: LES    时间: 2004-10-21 20:01

byebyelove,

你这个GWD是什么题目呀?


作者: createdream    时间: 2004-10-24 07:55
伴随结果
作者: bryan0806    时间: 2004-10-24 20:27
还是不懂its cargo of its cargo 这是什么玩意?
作者: LES    时间: 2004-10-25 23:05
打错了吧!
作者: LES    时间: 2004-10-25 23:06
偶记得网上的这套题目是网友亲自输入的,所以很有可能是打错了。
作者: looook    时间: 2004-11-14 13:43

是打错了,好象阅读中也有同样的现象, 有一题的逻辑题干还把of错打成了ok.  但不管怎么说,谢谢输入者.

总觉得,这套题思路怪怪的.  


作者: gwachen    时间: 2004-11-26 13:43

Could anyone explain why A is wrong for me ?

If the comma preceding " while" is omitted, is A right or better than C?

thanks very much!!


作者: 老鼠九条命    时间: 2004-11-29 02:35
污染了        比 导致了污染 要好一点,后者累赘,OG 里有好多这样的例子。
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-29 4:18:26编辑过]

作者: whitesand    时间: 2004-12-17 11:40
while是连词, 后面应该接句子
作者: TakeItEasy1    时间: 2005-5-16 14:26

while是连词, 后面应该接句子

是吗?那有些句子...,while doing...表伴随  应该也可以吧?

一下子举不出例子。。

请指教``


作者: violetyang83    时间: 2005-6-20 15:46

A答案的错误应该是在leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean 的逻辑主语是an oil barge


C中的是cargo leak,哪个对我也不清楚`````````


作者: maoliu    时间: 2005-8-31 04:23

可怎么感觉没有主句啊


作者: fdyk2001    时间: 2005-9-22 23:15

应该是打错了


选C


作者: mba06    时间: 2006-6-10 14:51
typo
作者: candypolo    时间: 2006-8-16 03:20
想问一下D为什么不行?
作者: peterchang    时间: 2006-8-19 15:45

D中的while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of.........

leak与cause并列,破坏原句意,

而且不是it(barge)造成污染,是leaking才会造成污染


作者: yaomao    时间: 2006-10-7 23:48
恩,这个题就是考伴随结果的伴随状语
作者: linda816    时间: 2006-10-13 04:51

提问,A.     and its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting

这里面cargo可以用主动时态吗?难道不应该是cargo was leaked?就好像D里面其实是barge leaked cargo呀?


作者: yl1004    时间: 2006-10-23 07:37

为什么B不对,with+n.+doing,独立主格呀


作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-11-1 15:04

B) with its cargo of its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted

b不好,it指代an oil barge,而句子的意思是leaking这件事pollute


作者: aqualon    时间: 2006-11-1 15:45

写错了


作者: 小蓓    时间: 2007-3-1 11:27

作者: Sacramento_CA    时间: 2007-4-29 23:41

我来贴一下完整的题目吧

GWD-24-38.

In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San
                

Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the

ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.

A.     leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of

B.     with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted

C.     and its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting

D.     while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of

E.      so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting.

答案

polluting做伴随状态/结果。


作者: llxx1985cn    时间: 2007-8-14 13:46
这题到底选什么?好像有人说是C,难道没有改变原句重心得嫌疑吗?
作者: woyuhong    时间: 2007-10-8 09:59
肯定是C啥。不过我不太明白A为什么错
作者: 我是马甲哥哥    时间: 2007-10-8 10:08
以下是引用woyuhong在2007-10-8 9:59:00的发言:
肯定是C啥。不过我不太明白A为什么错

A) leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of

while causing 修饰对象不明


作者: eileenmu木    时间: 2008-3-18 19:35

A怎样排除


作者: cd23518    时间: 2008-6-6 17:48

A怎样排除

頂..可以理解答案C 但無法第一時間排除A


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-6 17:49:16编辑过]

作者: MarilynR    时间: 2008-6-9 17:11
以下是引用TakeItEasy1在2005-5-16 14:26:00的发言:

while是连词, 后面应该接句子

是吗?那有些句子...,while doing...表伴随  应该也可以吧?

一下子举不出例子。。

我也迷惑了..以后看到while doing 结构就可以因为while后边没有跟完整句子而排除吗?


作者: zhengzhi    时间: 2008-7-11 13:14

原题是GWD-24-38C

In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.

A.      leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of

B.      with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted

C.      and its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting

D.      while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of

E.       so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting.

1.while的用法不对——应改为ang

2.cause the pollution 不如polluting简洁

3.ving表示伴随功能结果,本题强调因为漏了油,伴随结果污染;而不是因为航行而伴随结果漏油


作者: zhengzhi    时间: 2008-7-11 13:16
而且对于货物来说,leak是主动的,而不是被船leak的
作者: zhengzhi    时间: 2008-7-11 13:21

leak——To let (liuid&gas&liht)escape

Cargo是固体没办法被leak,只能自己leak东西污染环境


作者: lyannlam    时间: 2009-4-13 17:09
我认为A中while的用法错误,因为while 引导的时间状语从句中的谓语动词必须是延续性的动词,而“cause”是个短暂性动词,因此可以排除A.当然还有他因楼上的几位说的也有道理
作者: xiaoniuren    时间: 2009-5-8 11:25
UP
作者: jackieli007    时间: 2009-8-3 13:25

~~


作者: jackieli007    时间: 2009-8-3 13:30
~~
作者: ray_anne    时间: 2009-9-20 22:15
以下是引用zhengzhi在2008/7/11 13:14:00的发言:

原题是GWD-24-38C

In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city’s beaches.

A.      leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of

B.      with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted

C.      and its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting

D.      while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution of

E.       so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting.

1.while的用法不对——应改为ang

2.cause the pollution 不如polluting简洁

3.ving表示伴随功能结果,本题强调因为漏了油,伴随结果污染;而不是因为航行而伴随结果漏油

解释的很清晰


作者: sherry树丛    时间: 2009-11-15 12:36
以下是引用TakeItEasy1在2005-5-16 14:26:00的发言:

while是连词, 后面应该接句子

是吗?那有些句子...,while doing...表伴随  应该也可以吧?

一下子举不出例子。。

我也迷惑了..以后看到while doing 结构就可以因为while后边没有跟完整句子而排除吗?


whil后面确实应该接句子,而while doing这个结构是有前提的,它是状语从句的省略形式,省略与前半句相同的主语和谓语。详见白勇P221

-- by 会员 MarilynR (2008/6/9 17:11:00)





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3