ChaseDream

标题: GWD24-23 [打印本页]

作者: byebyelove    时间: 2004-10-21 15:56
标题: GWD24-23

24-23 Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the Earth would warm and by how much, but climatologists have indicated all along that the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.


A) the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.


B) the effects that are the most obvious ones, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, would be those impacting the most on people.


C) those effects to have the largest impact on people, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, are what are the most obvious effects.


D) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, the most obvious effects, that they would have the largest impact on people.


E) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, which are the most obvious effects, are those to impact the most on people.


KEY:A


I don't understand the structure of "A"


Hope somebody give me some advice!


Thanks!


作者: stellate    时间: 2004-10-21 16:27

the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.

=the most obvious effects would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess. and those(effects) that would have the largest impact on people would ALSO be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.


作者: agk99    时间: 2004-10-21 19:07

24-23. Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the Earth would warm and by how much, but(前後對比) climatologists have indicated all along that(引導後面子句) the most obvious effects, and those(most obvious effects) that would have the largest impact on people(插入句可忽略), (most obvious effects)would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess(and 並列三個).

總的來說就是but 前後各是一個主句帶一個從句,前後句意約略相反


作者: byebyelove    时间: 2004-10-21 19:25

thanks!!!!!!

GWD24 here
作者: killer34888    时间: 2004-10-24 21:20
但would的使用有没有异议呢?会不会让人感觉除了有indicated that +过去式,也有一种感觉,科学家显示的是可能错误的
作者: LES    时间: 2004-10-25 23:01

这题中and those...插入语的结构跟OG64完全一样!

40.   In metalwork one advantage of adhesive-bonding over spot-welding is that the contact, and hence the bonding, is effected continuously over a broad surface instead of a series of regularly spaced points with no bonding in between.

(A) instead of
(B) as opposed to
(C) in contrast with
(D) rather than atD

(E) as against being at


作者: JerryGuan    时间: 2004-12-11 19:24

LES

agk

You are right~


作者: paraglider    时间: 2004-12-14 11:21
原题呢???
作者: leemike0928    时间: 2004-12-19 16:01
LES你舉的例子很好,不過你可不可以在補充些,像這樣的插入句的,我對這種東西很沒有感覺
作者: zenger    时间: 2005-10-21 12:33
以下是引用LES在2004-10-25 23:01:00的发言:

这题中and those...插入语的结构跟OG64完全一样!


40.   In metalwork one advantage of adhesive-bonding over spot-welding is that the contact, and hence the bonding, is effected continuously over a broad surface instead of a series of regularly spaced points with no bonding in between.


(A) instead of
(B) as opposed to
(C) in contrast with
(D) rather than atD

(E) as against being at





and those恐怕不应该理解为插入吧。上例是and hence,就好比我们写AA,AI是使用的and thus一样,表示递近意思的并列啊!


个人认为这里的and就是and,不是和those一起的,开始我也认为这里的and用的不对,但重新考虑整句的意思,发现的确两个主语并列.两者可能一致,也可能不一致,合并构成从句的主语.[明确的名词,和可能的限定,使两个表述的内容可能不同,因此可以并列,并不重复]


作者: juningw    时间: 2005-10-24 23:35
以下是引用zenger在2005-10-21 12:33:00的发言:



and those恐怕不应该理解为插入吧。上例是and hence,就好比我们写AA,AI是使用的and thus一样,表示递近意思的并列啊!


个人认为这里的and就是and,不是和those一起的,开始我也认为这里的and用的不对,但重新考虑整句的意思,发现的确两个主语并列.两者可能一致,也可能不一致,合并构成从句的主语.[明确的名词,和可能的限定,使两个表述的内容可能不同,因此可以并列,并不重复]


同意!and those作为插入语太勉强。而且,因为后面的内容是非限定解释effects的。完全可以改成非限定定语从句啊。


作者: hawkinsxie    时间: 2006-6-19 17:23
以下是引用LES在2004-10-25 23:01:00的发言:

这题中and those...插入语的结构跟OG64完全一样!

40.   In metalwork one advantage of adhesive-bonding over spot-welding is that the contact, and hence the bonding, is effected continuously over a broad surface instead of a series of regularly spaced points with no bonding in between.

(A) instead of
(B) as opposed to
(C) in contrast with
(D) rather than atD

(E) as against being at

Admire !!!


作者: sch    时间: 2007-10-27 04:40
以下是引用zenger在2005-10-21 12:33:00的发言:


        


        

and those恐怕不应该理解为插入吧。上例是and hence,就好比我们写AA,AI是使用的and thus一样,表示递近意思的并列啊!


        

个人认为这里的and就是and,不是和those一起的,开始我也认为这里的and用的不对,但重新考虑整句的意思,发现的确两个主语并列.两者
可能一致,也可能不一致,合并构成从句的主语.[明确的名词,和可能的限定,使两个表述的内容可能不同,因此可以并列,并不重复]


同意是表示递进,但是不同意你说的表示并行.
如果是平行了,后面谓语就不是is了.

至于GWD这题我觉得还是当复合主语理解比较好,也就是说and表平行. 要说他是插入语有点牵强了把.

作者: lulu_odin    时间: 2008-5-3 16:37

作者: cecila    时间: 2008-7-14 23:54

怎么没有人解释一下5楼的问题呢?A中的would 仿佛很说不通啊,

说说我的思路给NN们批判一下:

我先排除BD,因为句意不畅结构有问题;

ACE当中我先排除的A,因为主句时态是现在完成时,从句没有理由用过去将来时,这里也不像是虚拟;

比较C和E之后认为C和E的意思大致一样但C不管从to have the largest impact和to impact来比较,还是are what are the most obvious effects这个表达来看都十分啰嗦,很不像正确答案。

再看E,唯一的缺陷就是which跳跃修饰了extremes,但是OG和prep的很多题目里which都不是严格不能跳跃修饰的,尤其这里 extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess短语中extremes是中心词,which,甚至that,跳跃修饰最邻近的中心词的例子很多,并且这里用are来区别开修饰的是复数的extremes,而不是单数的storminess,是GMAC在跳跃修饰时的常用手法。所以最后选了E。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-15 0:17:09编辑过]

作者: bmwedward    时间: 2008-8-13 14:51

OG以及GWD當中很多跳躍修飾的

所以小弟我亦然決然的選了E

如果硬要說A對的話, 就只能說是句意問題想要修飾中心的差異囉!

有沒有哪位NN願意分享一下


作者: 小胡子乖乖    时间: 2008-9-2 21:37
我也倾向于E。没有理由认为这个句子要用虚拟语气。
作者: 苹果古    时间: 2009-8-18 12:13

在茫茫无际的大草原上,我看见一群群牛,沐浴着ETS的清风,在GWD的吆喝下越走越远。。。这一刻,俺陶醉了。。。


作者: dullness    时间: 2009-9-5 18:18
我的理解:
句意最大,and表并列,表示那些明显而且最大影响的effects,复合主语,并与前半句讨论主题green effects对应。

原句没有表示A,B,C已经是the most obvious effects, E中却毫无理由的承认了这点which are...。A中的would be更合理。





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3