ChaseDream

标题: [求助]LSAT-8-4-21 WHAT'S MORE 什么意思？ [打印本页]

作者: G-CRACKER 时间: 2004-10-19 23:20
标题: [求助]LSAT-8-4-21 WHAT'S MORE 什么意思？

做这题是突然想起来GMAT阅读要求关注段与段之间的过渡词/句。所以看了what's more, 之后，就照着递进的关系往下读，可是选出的答案却是错的。这里what's more究竟怎么翻才对？

答案选E

21. Jane: Professor Harper's ideas for modifying the design of guitars are of no value because there is no general agreement among musicians as to what a guitar should sound like and. Consequently, no widely accepted basis for evaluating the merits of a guitar's sound.

Mark: What's more, Harper's ideas have had enough time to be adopted if they really resulted in superior sound. It took only ten years for the Torres design for guitars to be almost universally adopted because of the improvement it makes in tonal quality.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between Jane's argument and Mark's argument?

(A) Mark's argument shows how a weakness in Jane's argument can be overcome.

(B) Mark's argument has a premise in common with Jane's argument

(D) Mark's argument restates Jane's argument in other terms.

(E) Mark's argument and Jane's argument are based on conflicting suppositions.

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-10-19 23:24
表附加信息。

作者: G-CRACKER 时间: 2004-10-20 12:09

Mark 的话，有点讽刺的意思。JANE说新主意不可能被接受，MARK跟着讲，可以有足够的时间被接受，举例Torres只花了10年就被接受。如果是反语，那么两个人的人不都是认为不被接受？

作者: leeon 时间: 2004-10-20 12:41

J's supposition: no widely accepted basis for evaluating the merits of a guitar's sound.

M's supposition: they really resulted in superior sound.

作者: G-CRACKER 时间: 2004-10-20 13:07

thanks, leeon.

to think in this way, the answer is ok

by the way, how do u get this? After 1'st time reading, or check between answer and passage?

作者: leeon 时间: 2004-10-20 13:11
That's one atypical question in logic, after I read the paragraph, I do not know how to answer this question, but after I read all of the choice, I get the answer.

作者: G-CRACKER 时间: 2004-10-20 17:43

bullman!

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-10-20 18:23
M举的例子说T设计的吉他只用十年的时间就被广泛承认在音质上有提高。这个例子说明M是认为可以广泛认可音质的。be almost universally adopted because of the improvement it makes in tonal quality。J却在结论中直接说不行。

作者: G-CRACKER 时间: 2004-10-20 18:49
标题: [求助]LSAT-8-4-21 WHAT'S MORE 什么意思？

有道理。牛！

作者: chinesecheese 时间: 2005-12-23 13:34

Jane: there's no such thing as univerisally accepted guitar tone quality, therefore, really no such thing as "improved" tone quality

Mark: there's a such thing as "improved" tone quality, tore's theory was acceepted because of that.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)