ChaseDream

标题: 求教GMAT Arguement两道 [打印本页]

作者: MissRN    时间: 2012-8-7 14:38
标题: 求教GMAT Arguement两道
“Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their cases; consequently, good and affordable all-day child care must be made available to both male and female scientists if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, requirements for career advancement must be made more flexible so that preschool-age children can spend a significant portion of each day with a parent.”

"If the paper from every morning edition of the nation's largest newspaper were collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, about 5 million trees would be saved each year. This kind of recycling is unnecessary, however, since the newspaper maitains its own forests to ensure an uninterrupted supply of paper."

以上两段话,我分别只能找出一个漏洞…所以想请教一下各位高手其他破绽在哪里。并由此引申出一个问题:如果考试的时候碰到只能找出1到2个漏洞的情况应该怎么办呢?非常希望得到大家的指教!!谢谢~~~~
作者: 飞翔的毛毛虫    时间: 2012-8-7 23:25
第一个:1. 自我矛盾,一方面他认为scientists需要all-day child care;另一方面,他又认为scientists要灵活调整自己时间陪孩子。
2. 并不一定大部分的scientists都有pre-school children,他们可能大部分没孩子或孩子已经长大了。

第二个:1. 回收报纸不只是为了保证报纸的纸张供应,而且是为了保护环境。
2. 回收的纸张不一定用来做报纸,也可以用来做书和纸盒子,这和报纸商有没有树林保证报纸的纸张供应没关系。
3. 回收旧报纸的费用要比维护一块树林的费用低,而且具有可持续性。
作者: stella1220    时间: 2012-8-8 02:34
补充第一个:3. 一定要全天的托儿所嘛?家里没有其他人带孩子了?莫非这些科学家要么都是单亲家庭,要么科学家都和科学家结婚了?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3