ChaseDream
标题: 逻辑 [打印本页]
作者: jusaka 时间: 2012-8-3 11:43
标题: 逻辑
Many people argue that tobaccoadvertising plays a crucial role in causing teen-agers to start or continue smoking. In Norway, however, where there has been a ban on tobaccoadvertising since 1975, smoking is at least as prevalent among teen-agers as it is in countries that do not ban such advertising.
Which of the following statements draws the most reliable conclusion from the information above?
(a) Tobaccoadvertising cannot be the only factor that affects the prevalence of smoking among teen-agers.
(b) Advertising does not play a role in causing teen-agers to start or continue smoking.
(c) Banning tobaccoadvertising does not reduce the consumption of tobacco.
(d) More teen-agers smoke if they are not exposed to tobaccoadvertising than if they are.(A)
(e) Most teen-agers who smoked in 1975 did not stop when the ban on tobaccoadvertising was implemented.
不明白呀~~
有没有广告,吸烟还是一样流行,也就是说广告并不是一个factor啊,为什么B不对呢???
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |