楼主理解错了哦,再看看题目。
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically.The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves.
Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.
尤其是上面那一段,很清楚说明了这个人为啥反对这个计划。因为他认为这对这些司机来说不公平,他们要多出钱,但是却没有享受到任何直接利益。
那么这就很明显了,你要推翻这个人的主张,就要证明,其实司机享受到了利益。那么下列哪项证明他享受到了利益呢,很明显就是D啦。为啥咧?你看以前实施同样的计划,道路上就有20%的司机去了别的地方,然后道路就没有那么拥挤啦,那么对这些交了钱的司机来说,其实他们就是享受了道路没那么拥挤这个benefit,所以是作者主张错误,耶。
-- by 会员 pinkking (2012/7/30 22:34:21)