1. A recent study of ancient clay deposits has provided new evidence supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.
(A) supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that
(B) supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact
(C) that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
(D) in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and that(B)
(E) of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires a
答案为B,我的问题是B是否应为
supporting the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact,因为后面by a meteorite impact明显提示要用被动语态
这个were不可以加,因为ignited by a meteorite impact是去过分词做后置定语修饰global forest fires的,而该that从句的谓语是contributed to。
如果加上were,那么该从句就有两个谓语了。
重要的是谁修饰谁,弄清逻辑关系即可:
supporting 修饰evidence, the theory后面的that为同位语修饰;
ignited作分词修饰fire,contribute为that从句的谓语;
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |