ChaseDream

标题: 陈向东逻辑 [打印本页]

作者: jeans2011    时间: 2012-7-24 15:24
标题: 陈向东逻辑
64. People cannot be morally responsible for things over which they have no control. Therefore, they should not be held morally responsible for any inevitable consequences of such things, either. Determining whether adults have any control over the treatment they are receiving can be difficult. Hence in some cases it can be difficult to know whether adults bear any moral responsibility for the way they are treated. Everyone, however sometimes acts in ways that are an inevitable consequence of treatment received as an infant, and infants clearly cannot control, and so are not morally responsible for, the treatment they receive.
D. If a given action is within a certain person's control that person should be held morally responsible for the consequences of that action.
这题不选D,我就是想问D为什么错了?
作者: s_dUSA    时间: 2012-7-25 07:47
First sentence: if no control, then no responsibility. It's contrapositive should be if responsible, then control.

D said that if control, then responsible, it is reversed, so it is wrong.

This is a LSAT logical reasoning question, trick but fun
作者: jeans2011    时间: 2012-7-25 11:04
thanks!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3