The speaker contradicts the statement in the text that owing to several adverse reasons the buzzing tactic should be banned.He states that the reasons given in the passage are misleading.
To begin with,the lecturer contends that unlike the ordinary advertisement ,the buzzer, for example, the speaker actually has used the phone service and he is really fond of this service .Thus ,the company hires him to serve as the buzzer and tell the truth of his feeling about this service .The reading, however,by contrast asserts that since the buzzers are paid to advertise the products ,they tend to tell incorrect information of the products as the ordinary Ads do.
The second reason suggested in the passage, that people will be less critical about the buzzers‘ words and believe most of what the buzzers say, is rejected by the speaker. According to the lecturer, he claims that people like to ask a lot of questions about the products or service while talking with the buzzers, such as: how much is the price ? how is the service? how long have you used it? If the buzzer can not provide the answers to these questions, people won't believe the buzzers and they won't buy the service or products which the buzzers are buzzing .
The speaker also chanlleges the final point of the passage, that since buzzing is misleading and unreliable, after awaring the presence of the buzzers, people tend not to trust others so that buzzing harm the social relationship among people. On the opposite, the lecturer contends that since the company will hire the buzzers for the products which is of high quality. The speaker, a buzzer, has a high oppinoin of the phone service after using it. Therefore, the people he buzzs also will have good experience while using the service. Hence, it turns out that people tends to be more trustful and opening to each other.
不错,不错,很完美的说。