大家好! 最近刚开始着手用小安阅读法复习阅读. 有点疑问想请教大家:
他说要把所有的题目分类,然后是分完后一类一类的看吗?那每看一道题都要把文章看一遍吗?下次看另一类题时又要把文章看一遍?那速度岂不是太慢?
还有关于分类的问题,那个细节题到底是哪些? 我总不会区分哪些是直接事实题的题干,哪些是信息题的题干 麻烦大牛指点! 万分感谢!
第一、边看边总结。
第二、文章确实要多看。看到非常熟,然后体会。
还想问问小安 结构题具体是哪些? 它的题干有什么特点??
为什么没人来解答
很着急啊 现在正在复习阅读 麻烦高人指点一下 谢谢了!!!
结构题即organization题,一般是问文章中的一段在文中和其他段落的关系,可以通过逻辑简图推出,举2个例子(OG11.13)
OG-RC 11 分析
At the end of the nineteenth century, a rising interest in Native American customs and an increasing desire to understand Native American culture prompted ethnologists to begin recording the life stories of Native American. Ethnologists had a distinct reason for wanting to hear the stories: they were after linguistic or anthropological data that would supplement their own field observations, and they believed that the personal stories, even of a single individual, could increase their understanding of the cultures that they had been observing from without (from without: 从...外面). In addition many ethnologists at the turn of the century believed that Native American manners and customs were rapidly disappearing, and that it was important to preserve for posterity as much information as could be adequately recorded before the cultures disappeared forever.
There were, however, arguments against this method as a way of acquiring accurate and complete information. Franz Boas, for example, described autobiographies as being “of limited value, and useful chiefly for the study of the perversion of truth by memory,” while Paul Radin contended that investigators rarely spent enough time with the tribes they were observing, and inevitably derived results too tinged by the investigator’s own emotional tone to be reliable.
Even more importantly, as these life stories moved from the traditional oral mode to recorded written form, much was inevitably lost. Editors often decided what elements were significant to the field research (field research: 实际教学, 现场调查研究) on a given tribe. Native Americans recognized that the essence of their lives could not be communicated in English and that events that they thought significant were often deemed unimportant by their interviewers. Indeed, the very act of telling their stories could force Native American narrators to distort their cultures, as taboos had to be broken to speak the names of dead relatives crucial to their family stories.
Despite all of this, autobiography remains a useful tool for ethnological research: such personal reminiscences and impressions, incomplete as they may be, are likely to throw more light on the working of the mind and emotions than any amount of speculation from an ethnologist or ethnological theorist from another culture.
逻辑简图:
1. 提出研究方法(recording life stories),递进(in addition)需要这种方法的另一个原因(rapidly disappearing)
2. 负评价(however),limitation (accurate and complete),举例(for example)FB/PR
3. 负评价递进(Even more importantly),limitation (oralàwritten / English communicated / essence to NA but not to other),递进(indeed),limitation (act of telling distort cultures)
4. 让步,正评价(despite all of this),肯定这种方法尽管它有局限性
总结:本文属于人文类,评论性文章,首段提出记录印第安人生活的方法的原因,二、三段指出这种方法的不足之出,四段转折肯定这种方法。
1. Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage? 结构题(看逻辑简图)
(A) The historical backgrounds of two currently used research methods are chronicled.
(B) The validity of the data collected by using two different research methods is compared.
(C) The usefulness of a research method is questioned and then a new method is proposed.
(D) The use of a research method is described and the limitations of the results obtained are discussed.
(E) A research method is evaluated and the changes necessary for its adaptation to other subject areas are discussed.
OG-RC 13
Two recent publications offer different assessment of the career of the famous British nurse Florence Nightingale.(TS) A book by Anne Summers(负观点一) seeks to debunk(-) the idealizations and present a reality at odds with Nightingale’s heroic reputation. According to Summers, Nightingale’s importance during the Crimean War has been exaggerated(-): not until near the war’s end did she become supervisor of the female nurses. Additionally,(负观点二) Summers writes that the contribution of the nurses to the relief of the wounded was at best marginal(-). The prevailing problems of military medicine were caused by army organizational practices, and the addition of a few nurses to the medical staff could be no more than symbolic(-). Nightingale’s place in the national pantheon, Summers asserts, is largely due to the propagandistic efforts of contemporary newspaper reporters(-).(略读)
By contrast,(转折) the editors(正观点一) of a new volume of Nightingale’s letters view Nightingale as a person who significantly influenced(+) not only her own age but also subsequent generations. They highlight(+/exaggerated) her ongoing efforts to reform sanitary conditions after the war(/during the Crimean War). For example, 74 76when she learned that peacetime living conditions in British barracks were so horrible that the death rate of enlisted men far exceeded that of neighboring civilian populations, she succeeded(+) in persuading the government to establish a Royal Commission on the Health of the Army. She used sums raised through public contributions to found a nurses’ training hospital in London. Even in administrative matters, the editors assert, her practical intelligence was formidable(+): as recently as 1947 the British Army’s medical services were still using the cost-accounting system she had devised in the 1860’s.(略读)
I believe that(作者观点-正) the evidence of her letters supports(+) continued respect for Nightingale’s brilliance and creativity(+). When counseling a village schoolmaster to encourage children to use their faculties of observation, she sounds like a modern educator(+). Her insistence on classifying the problems of the needy in order to devise appropriate treatments is similar to the approach of modern social workers(+).(略读) In sum(TS), although(转折) Nightingale may not have achieved all of her goals during the Crimean War, her breadth of vision and ability to realize ambitious projects(+) have earned her an eminent place(+) among the ranks of social pioneers(+).
逻辑简图:
1. N的贡献两个不同评价:TS… 负观点一(AS),debunk(-),exaggerated(-)… additionally负观点二 2. 正观点:bu contrast … 正观点(editiors),significantly influenced(+),highlight(+)… for example 3. 作者观点:I believe that… supports(+),brilliance and creativity(+)… in sum(TS),although(转折),eminent(+),pioneers(+) 总结:本文属于人文、评论型文章。首段提出2种针对N的不同评价,AS认为扩大了N在战中的影响;第二段,editors肯定N在战后的作用;末段,作者在承认N在战中未完全实现目标的基础上肯定了N的成就。
79. In the last paragraph, the author is primarily concerned with结构题(末段,作者用论据N的信supports观点“earned her an eminent place among the ranks of social pioneers”)
(A) summarizing the arguments about Nightingale presented in the first two paragraphs
(B) refuting the view of Nightingale’s career presented in the preceding paragraph
(C) analyzing the weaknesses of the evidence presented elsewhere in the passage
(D) citing evidence to support a view of Nightingale’s career
(E) correcting a factual error occurring in one of the works under review
非常感谢JJ的指导。我再研究研究。
Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage? 结构题(看逻辑简图)
可以前上新东方的时候老师说这叫写法性主题题,怎么回事啊??
另外想再请教这几个题干是否是结构题:
1)The last paragraph performs which of the following functions in the passage?
2)Which of the following best describes the relation of the first paragraph to the passage as a whole ?
不好意思 问题较多 烦劳耐心解答 谢谢!!
可以前上新东方的时候老师说这叫写法性主题题,怎么回事啊??
呵呵,名称不一样,我对结构题的分析含2种,定位在于问文章中的一段在文中和其他段落的关系,或文章的整体脉络关系
另外“写法性主题题”和我的文章真题脉络关系定位是一样的,mm可以按新东方的方法分,这个本来就是考察文章整体的把握,但是形式是考文章的框架关系。
1)The last paragraph performs which of the following functions in the passage?
2)Which of the following best describes the relation of the first paragraph to the passage as a whole ?
不好意思 问题较多 烦劳耐心解答 谢谢!!
第一种是的,第二种也可能是类比题
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |