ChaseDream

标题: gwd 4-4 [打印本页]

作者: windyyang    时间: 2004-10-10 00:28
标题: gwd 4-4

Q4:


A new hair-growing drug is being sold for three times the price, per milligram, as the drug’s maker charges for another product with the same active ingredient.




  • as

  • than

  • that

  • of what

  • at which

  • 看了以前的讨论,在A、C、D、E之间还是没能选出一个答案,请指教


    作者: jnlvo    时间: 2004-10-10 10:17
    个人现在还是倾向于C,  charge price还是很常见的,原来答案D,还未看到令人信服的依据。
    作者: lindachen76    时间: 2005-1-23 14:56

    D

    Maybe we might understand in the way:  

    three times the price of what the drug’s maker charges....

    In this sentence, the main frame is  xx times + noun+ of... ; what is equal to the price that....

    Thank you


    作者: Q2003    时间: 2005-1-24 11:11

    up


    作者: nowait    时间: 2005-4-8 00:17

    I am with the answer: C (that).


    got one example from google: "hundreds of thousands of these Americans could have paid their medical bills if they were not (literally) three times the price that the same hospitals charge their insured patients. "


    "three times the price of what ... charges for ..." sounds awkward. if this usage is right, what does "what" stand for?


    作者: godiex    时间: 2005-4-24 15:54

    同意C.

    that 引导的是同位语从句, 后面的从句用来解释price。

    D: 如果what 指代price,则出现price of price。但price of sth.中的sth需要是另一个对象,如price of the watch手表的价格。

    E: at which 中的at似乎不妥。如果看作定语从句的话,变成charge for sth. at (price)。应该是charge (price) for sth. 如the maker charges 30RMB for the drug.


    作者: Avantasia    时间: 2005-5-5 12:25

    what=the thing that, D中的what为什么不可以理解成the drug that, 这里的that是drug的关系代词, 而且存在charge for sth的说法?


    作者: tonyadidas    时间: 2005-5-5 19:58
    斑竹啊,的确按你所讲the thing that很说得通,但是[the thing]不要只用that就够了,也就是说without the thing the meaning of this sentence has not been impeded or without any loss in meaning(这种解释og上蛮常见的吧)。你说呢?当然,逻辑与结构上D都是没有错的,应该是比concise吧。
    作者: 三脚猫    时间: 2005-6-9 01:52
    what为什么不可以理解为the price that , 这样D不就能解释通了吗??
    作者: jeffreyzf    时间: 2005-6-20 09:02

    I'm in preference of D (of what).


    When putting "that" in the sentence, it doesn't sound right when speaking the sentence out. And right after the comma, is it ok to put "that" at such a place?


    I think "three times the price (get rid of the middle part) of what the drug maker charges for another pill...", then the "what" brings out the remaining of the sentence pretty smoothly.


    No significant evidence to proof why it's right, but it does sound much better than "that" in my opinion.


    作者: herrydami    时间: 2005-6-28 06:57
    I think "what" here can not be replaced by "the thing that" because in the sub clause there is an accusative "another product". BTW, I support C "that"
    作者: loveyouzh    时间: 2005-9-10 14:49
    ,that...非限定性的从句,这样使用that不对啊。支持选D
    作者: qwyang    时间: 2005-10-19 01:14
    我也是把what 理解为 the price that
    作者: tobytao    时间: 2005-11-13 16:14

    想了半天,还是觉得that比较合理。表明 a price the drug's maker charge for another product.


    另外,of what用在此处是不太好,如果一定要用what在这个句子里面,感觉这样会更好些。


    A new hair-growing drug is being sold for three times what the drug’s maker charges for another product with the same active ingredient.


    作者: vedder    时间: 2005-11-29 17:20
    不知道为什么,就是觉得of what读着爽。难道我也有语感了?
    作者: steveyangxt    时间: 2005-12-10 15:59
    c不对 整理是charge the price for doing sth 应该是charge for doing sth /sth at teh price
    作者: 水色    时间: 2006-4-28 15:24
    标题: 回复:(三脚猫)what为什么不可以理解为the price th...

    偶也觉得应该是D, of what=of the price that


    唉,只是看讨论看的偶越来越糊涂了


    作者: 司香尉    时间: 2006-5-2 10:41
    我也选D,但是看了讨论越来越糊涂了。
    作者: catcenter    时间: 2006-5-4 17:09

    讨论看了半小时,,,,


    暂且就跟着大部分NN走选D吧...


    作者: babyyee    时间: 2006-6-5 23:35

    按照XDF老师讲的首先就要排除C啊,他们的说法是THAT不可以修饰非限制性定从,前面是不可以有介词和逗号的啊。我个人认为选E。


    作者: gracedaish    时间: 2006-6-6 12:32

    我选D,主要是对x times + n. 不确定

    这里that之前是个插入成分,可以忽略,还是个限定性。


    作者: maydaythekid    时间: 2006-8-19 12:58

    世界和平。。。

    我反正晕乎了,GWD看样子真的很多题没有确切答案


    作者: yaomao    时间: 2006-10-1 00:06
    我选C,满分NN也这样说的,就更坚定了
    作者: luluQ    时间: 2006-10-10 07:52

    If we understand in the way:

    three times the price of what the drug’s maker charges....

    In this sentence, the main frame is xx times + noun+ of... ; what is equal to the price that....

    Then the sentence becomes:

    three times the price of the price that the drug’s maker charges

    Isn't it too wordy?

    Only personal opinion


    作者: luluQ    时间: 2006-10-10 07:54
    I chose C
    作者: Cantaloupe    时间: 2006-10-10 15:23

    答案是D

    1、C: that不能引导非限制性定语从句,直接开除。

    2、E:Charge的用法是:charge $$$ for sth... "at which" 中的at在这里是多余的。

    3、Of what=that,可以引导非限定从,直接打勾。

    我的问题: 有 of which 的说法吗?of which 和 of what区别?如果选项F: of which,那选C还是F呢? 


    作者: yangjh1111    时间: 2007-1-11 10:54
    以下是引用babyyee在2006-6-5 23:35:00的发言:

    按照XDF老师讲的首先就要排除C啊,他们的说法是THAT不可以修饰非限制性定从,前面是不可以有介词和逗号的啊。我个人认为选E。

    我也选了E,因为which引导定语从句修饰the price,而且“以……价钱”应该要个介词at。 不知道还有人是选E的么?


    作者: mbz    时间: 2007-1-11 11:13
    以下是引用yangjh1111在2007-1-11 10:54:00的发言:

    我也选了E,因为which引导定语从句修饰the price,而且“以……价钱”应该要个介词at。 不知道还有人是选E的么?

    E is wrong b/c you charge a price but not charge at a price.


    作者: will_kk    时间: 2007-5-17 01:26

    呵呵,看到tony的发言了,激动了一把

    能看成of what是宾语从句么?

    同意选D


    作者: wsdoll    时间: 2007-8-18 10:48
    a???这题也有争议!
    作者: qianrene    时间: 2007-10-4 12:41
    以下是引用yangjh1111在2007-1-11 10:54:00的发言:

    我也选了E,因为which引导定语从句修饰the price,而且“以……价钱”应该要个介词at。 不知道还有人是选E的么?

    charge the price for product

    charge for product at the price?E为什么不对

    http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=53545

    关于C的:GWD 5-29的逻辑中就直接出现了charge price for products的用法。

    A. There is no significant difference among manufacturers of name-brand cereals in the prices they charge for their products.

    D.Because of lower advertising costs, stores are able to offer their own brands of cereals at significantly lower prices than those charged for name-brand cereals.


     关于E的应该是charge product at the price就对,把for去掉,charge后面应该直接跟被收钱的人,产品,或者价格


    作者: angela-rong    时间: 2007-10-6 00:20

    longman字典里的例句

    Calls will be charged at 44p per minute. (p应该是penny吧)

    所以我个人意见: charge at ***price for sth 的表达正确。

    我选E。at which

    A new hair-growing drug is being sold for three times the price, per milligram, as the drug’s maker charges for another product with the same active ingredient.

    绿色部分理解成插入语,补充说明。


    作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-11-21 21:58

    我选C

    the price that,逗号隔开的部分是插入语,而且其实that可省

    有例为证:GWD-5-29,是一道CR题,其A选项是

    1. There is no significant difference among manufacturers of name-brand cereals in the prices they charge for their products.

    大家看是不是说明,C的用法正确?


    作者: lissy_721    时间: 2007-11-21 22:18
    没人选e吗??
    作者: amorela    时间: 2007-11-30 13:49

    “,Per miligram,” 是插入语,可以省略不看.所以that引导一个限定性定语从句.


    [此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-30 14:15:43编辑过]

    作者: Sophia0703    时间: 2008-7-12 11:10

    作者: rorochen    时间: 2008-8-10 23:12

    e......


    作者: MBA1982    时间: 2008-9-10 01:45

    同意选C。

    有人出来讲讲E为什么错吗? 刚才还比较清楚,被一哥们儿出来一忽悠,又觉得E也挺对!


    作者: Netherlander    时间: 2008-9-24 21:00

    鲁能是冠军!


    作者: jonathan1987    时间: 2008-10-25 22:44

    我 觉得,首先, per milligram 是个插入语,所以应该省略.

    T-4-17

    Galileo did not invent the telescope, but on hearing, in 1609, that such an optical instrument had been made, he quickly built his own device from an organ pipe and spectacle lenses.

    A.     Galileo did not invent the telescope, but on hearing, in 1609, that such an optical instrument had been made, he

    B.     Galileo had not invented the telescope, but when he heard, in 1609, of such an optical instrument having been made,

    C.     Galileo, even though he had not invented the telescope, on hearing, in1609, that such an optical instrument had been made, he

    D.    Even though Galileo did not invent the telescope, on hearing, in 1609, that such an optical instrument had been made,

    E.     Even though Galileo did not invent the telescope, but when he heard, 1609, of such an optical instrument being made, he

    这题选a.

    所以选a 的话,因为比较错误, three times as 错. 排除

    我觉得应该选c,因为 per milligram 作插入语省略了, that 就可以直接连在price 后面了, 至于d 和e ,我不知道为什么错,但是总感觉不如c来的好.请各位NN帮忙看看d,e的毛病!!


    作者: pallasgrace    时间: 2009-2-5 16:41

    我也认为应该是D

    同理

    sth is three times the size of B 

    这里size=price B=the price  又用what作为成分  从句可以改成 the drug’s maker charges what for another product with the same active ingredient.


    作者: wlcheer    时间: 2009-12-23 11:38
    选C吧,
    作者: paul880126    时间: 2010-2-8 00:00
    C选项,其实'that'完全可以省略掉的




    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3