标题: 问题啊,求解答啊,求解释啊 [打印本页] 作者: ssysyjzmf 时间: 2012-6-12 22:47 标题: 问题啊,求解答啊,求解释啊 GWD25-Q2. In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than KD5.50 per hour. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Most people in Kirlandia who are currently earning the minimum wage have been employed at their current jobs for less than a year. B. Some firms in Kirlandia have paid workers considerably less than KD5.00 per hour, in violation of Kirlandic employment regulations. C. Many businesses hire trainees at or near the minimum wage but must reward trained workers by keeping their pay levels above the pay level of trainees. D. The greatest growth in Kirlandia’s economy in recent years has been in those sectors where workers earn wages that tend to be much higher than the minimum wage. E. The current minimum wage is insufficient for a worker holding only one job to earn enough to support a family, even when working full time at that job.作者: sasha_wen 时间: 2012-6-13 13:12
我选C 首先要清楚什么是结论,在这里结论就是涨工资不会导致通货膨胀,依据是仅有一小部分人的收入现在低于5.5,其实说白了就是大部分人收入都高于5.5,所以即使将最低工资提高到5.5,也不会有什么大影响,问你削弱结论,就是大部分人工资低于5.5,所以最低工资提高到5.5有很大影响,通过削弱论据来削弱结论,C选项对应的很好,就是答案!作者: sasha_wen 时间: 2012-6-13 14:33
给楼主提个建议,以后提问请把标题改为题目的出处,后面再跟上求解,请楼主改一下自己所有错误发文的标题,方便将来的童鞋查询!作者: ssysyjzmf 时间: 2012-6-13 21:50
哦哦 ,谢谢啊~~作者: 包子不包子 时间: 2013-9-4 14:36
但是题目说了
since only a very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than KD5.50 per hour.
只有很小一部分的人工资小于5.5
不是和C矛盾吗
都已近是事实了 怎么再改条件呀作者: gsskinggss 时间: 2013-10-19 12:31
应该是,最小工资的涨了,比最小工资高的也要随着最小工资上涨,所以大家工资都会涨,所以会有影响。作者: 欢欢2727 时间: 2013-10-27 11:26